Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 50: 2323-2330, 2004. First published October 7, 2004; 10.1373/clinchem.2004.038489
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2004.038489v1
50/12/2323    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Weisel, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xu, X.
Right arrow Articles by Weisel, C. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Drug Monitoring and Toxicology
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2004;50:2323-2330.)
© 2004 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Drug Monitoring and Toxicology

Simultaneous and Sensitive Measurement of Anabasine, Nicotine, and Nicotine Metabolites in Human Urine by Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Xu Xu1,3, Michael M. Iba2 and Clifford P. Weisel1,3,a

1 Environmental Biomarker Shared Resource, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
2 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy and the Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
3 Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey–Robert Wood Johnson Medical School (UMDNJ–RWJMS), Piscataway, NJ.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, 170 Frelinghuysen Rd., Piscataway, NJ 08854. Fax 732-445-0116; e-mail weisel{at}eohsi.rutgers.edu.

Background: Determination of nicotine metabolism/pharmacokinetics provides a useful tool for estimating uptake of nicotine and tobacco-related toxicants, for understanding the pharmacologic effects of nicotine and nicotine addiction, and for optimizing nicotine dependency treatment.

Methods: We developed a sensitive method for analysis of nicotine and five major nicotine metabolites, including cotinine, trans-3'-hydroxycotinine, nicotine-N'-oxide, cotinine-N-oxide, and nornicotine, in human urine by liquid chromatography coupled with a TSQ Quantum triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (LC/MS/MS). Urine samples to which deuterium-labeled internal standards had been added were extracted with a simple solid-phase extraction procedure. Anabasine, a minor tobacco alkaloid, was also included.

Results: The quantification limits of the method were 0.1–0.2 µg/L, except for nicotine (1 µg/L). Cotinine-N-oxide, trans-3'-hydroxycotinine, nicotine, and anabasine in urine were almost completely recovered by the solid-phase extraction, whereas the mean extraction recoveries of nicotine-N'-oxide, cotinine, and nornicotine were 51.4%, 78.6%, and 78.8%, respectively. This procedure provided a linearity of three to four orders of magnitude for the target analytes: 0.2–400 µg/L for nicotine-N'-oxide, cotinine-N-oxide, and anabasine; 0.2–4000 µg/L for cotinine, nornicotine, and trans-3'-hydroxycotinine; and 1.0–4000 µg/L for nicotine. The overall interday method imprecision and recovery were 2.5–18% and 92–109%, respectively.

Conclusions: This sensitive LC/MS/MS procedure can be used to determine nicotine metabolism profiles of smokers, people during nicotine replacement therapy, and passively exposed nonsmokers. This method avoids the need for a time-consuming and labor-intensive sample enrichment step and thus allows for high-throughput sample preparation and automation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.