Listen to the Latest Podcast!
Clinical Chemistry 50: 596-602, 2004. First published January 15, 2004; 10.1373/clinchem.2003.026120
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2003.026120v1
50/3/596    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thorspecken, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pötsch, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thorspecken, J.
Right arrow Articles by Pötsch, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Drug Monitoring and Toxicology
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2004;50:596-602.)
© 2004 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Drug Monitoring and Toxicology

In Vitro Contamination of Hair by Marijuana Smoke

Jana Thorspecken1, Gisela Skopp1,a and Lucia Pötsch2

1 Institut für Rechtsmedizin und Verkehrsmedizin der Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 2 Institut für Rechtsmedizin der Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Institute of Legal Medicine, Voss-Strasse 2, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany. Fax 49-6221-565252; e-mail gisela_skopp{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Background: The deposition of cannabinoids on/into hair from environmental smoke can be considered as a potential source of drug findings in hair. We studied external uptake of cannabinoids from marijuana smoke, investigating possible influencing factors on drug uptake and the efficiency of decontamination procedures.

Methods: Strands of a natural hair sample were moistened with water, greased with sebum or sebum/sweat, or bleached or permed. Treated and untreated samples were exposed to marijuana smoke for 60 min. Aliquots of each hair strand were either kept unwashed or were washed with methanol, dichloromethane, or 5 g/L dodecyl sulfate in water. Cannabinoid concentrations in unwashed and washed hair samples, as well as in air samples collected from the exposure chamber and in the marijuana sample being combusted, were quantified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry or gas chromatography.

Results: Cannabinoids were deposited on the hair fibers from marijuana smoke. Cannabinoid concentrations were dependent on air concentration and hair pretreatment. Uptake was less in untreated than in pretreated hair. Concentrations were increased in damp hair, but were even higher in greased hair. There was no significant difference in concentration between bleached and permed strands. External contaminants were completely removed by washing with methanol and dichloromethane in untreated hair only. Washing with dodecyl sulfate in water was insufficient in all cases.

Conclusions: Exposures of hair to marijuana smoke yields detectable cannabinoids depending on concentrations in the air, hair care habits, and cosmetic treatment. Environmental marijuana smoke exposure may produce false-positive or falsely increased test results in hair.