HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Oosterhuis, W. P. Articles by Horvath, A. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Oosterhuis, W. P. Articles by Horvath, A. R. Related Collections Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization

Evidence-Based Guidelines in Laboratory Medicine: Principles and Methods

¹ Department of Clinical Chemistry, St. Elisabeth Hospital, PO Box 90151, 5000 LC Tilburg, The Netherlands. ² Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Medical School, Charlottesville, VA. ³ Laboratoire de Biologie Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier Général, Rodez, France. ⁴ Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Haukeland University Hospital, and Division of General Practice, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. ⁵ Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Szeged, Albert Szent-Gyorgyi Medical School, Szeged, Hungary.

^aAuthor for correspondence. Fax 31-13-5352390; e-mail w.oosterhuis{at}elisabeth.nl.

Background: Guidelines are commonly used tools for supporting medical decisions. Formulating evidence-based recommendations has become a leading principle in guideline development.

Aim: This narrative review integrates the most recent methods of evidence-based guideline development and adapts those to the field of laboratory medicine.

Summary: We present a 10-step process and a list of criteria for the development of laboratory guidelines. Laboratory guidelines should be outcome oriented, be developed by a multidisciplinary team, and begin with a clear statement of the clinical question(s) that the use of the test(s) is addressing. The clinical questions define the type of study designs that offer the best evidence to answer those questions. Guidelines should be based on the critical appraisal and systematic review of literature and explicitly state the strength of evidence supporting each recommendation. Pragmatic considerations dictate that priority is given to topics with the highest clinical or economic impact. Scientific evidence is necessary but insufficient for recommendations, as considered judgment is required about benefits, harms, costs, and local applicability of recommendations. Formal consensus methods are needed when the evidence base is lacking or controversial. Guidelines should be disseminated widely and their impact monitored regularly. Regular reviewing is needed because the lack of timely updates is a major cause of nonadherence to guidelines.

Conclusions: Guidelines should be developed in a transparent process by a multidisciplinary team, with graded recommendations based on critically appraised scientific studies. Systematic, standardized, and explicit methodology, adapted to laboratory medicine, should be followed when developing recommendations involving the use of laboratory tests.

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				J. S. Burgers Guideline Quality and Guideline Content: Are They Related? Clin. Chem., January 1, 2006; 52(1): 3 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Watine, B. Friedberg, E. Nagy, R. Onody, W. Oosterhuis, P. S. Bunting, J.-C. Charet, and A. R. Horvath Conflict between Guideline Methodologic Quality and Recommendation Validity: A Potential Problem for Practitioners Clin. Chem., January 1, 2006; 52(1): 65 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]