Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 50: 961-972, 2004; 10.1373/clinchem.2003.029645
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coley, N. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coley, N. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow History
(Clinical Chemistry. 2004;50:961-972.)
© 2004 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

History

Medical Chemists and the Origins of Clinical Chemistry in Britain (circa 1750–1850)

Noel G. Coley1

1 Address for correspondence: 24 Kayemoor Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5HT, United Kingdom. E-mail n.g.coley{at}surrey28.freeserve.co.uk.


Abstract

In this history, I review developments leading toward the establishment of clinical chemistry in Britain. Chemical research by certain physicians occurred in the context of medical traditions founded on vitalism, distillation analysis, and limited chemical knowledge. Urine chemistry figured prominently in this period together with the analysis of kidney and bladder stones. Bright’s team studying albuminuria was the first clinical research school in Britain, whereas Prout’s survey of physiological chemistry, based on meticulous attention to analysis, was the best summary of human metabolism before Liebig’s Animal Chemistry. Liebig’s ideas influenced all physicians who were interested in chemistry. Henry Bence Jones based his medical practice on Liebig’s theories. His research relating urinary phosphates to diet and exercise revealed the so-called Bence Jones proteins and investigated the distribution and persistence of drugs in the body. J.L.W. Thudichum used analytical skills learned from Liebig in his brain chemistry work. George Owen Rees investigated urine analysis and the relationship between urine and blood, using Liebig’s practical methods while condemning an uncritical acceptance of his theories. These and similar studies showed that chemistry could improve clinical medicine, and because it could also reveal the onset of disease even before clinical symptoms developed, it offered valuable support to preventive medicine. However, so many physicians resisted the introduction of chemistry that progress toward the establishment of clinical chemistry in nineteenth-century Britain was slow.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
L. Rosenfeld
A Century of Growth: A Century of Progress
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2004; 50(5): 796 - 797.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.