Clinical Chemistry Siemens Point of Care - Urinalysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 51: 1811-1822, 2005. First published August 11, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.052746
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2005.052746v1
51/10/1811    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peters, F. T.
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peters, F. T.
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, H. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Drug Monitoring and Toxicology
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:1811-1822.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Drug Monitoring and Toxicology

Drug Testing in Blood: Validated Negative-Ion Chemical Ionization Gas Chromatographic–Mass Spectrometric Assay for Enantioselective Measurement of the Designer Drugs MDEA, MDMA, and MDA and Its Application to Samples from a Controlled Study with MDMA

Frank T. Peters1, Nele Samyn2, Caroline T.J. Lamers3, Wim J. Riedel3, Thomas Kraemer1, Gert de Boeck2 and Hans H. Maurer1,a

1 Department of Experimental and Clinical Toxicology, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
2 National Institute of Criminalistics and Criminology, Brussels, Belgium.
3 Experimental Psychopharmacology Unit, Brain & Behaviour Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Experimental and Clinical Toxicology, Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Saarland, D-66421 Homburg (Saar), Germany. Fax 49-6841-16-26051; e-mail hans.maurer{at}uniklinikum-saarland.de.

Background: The enantiomers of the designer drugs 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), and 3,4-methylenedioxyethylamphetamine (MDEA) differ in their pharmacologic and toxicologic potency. The aim of this study was to develop an assay for measuring these enantiomers in small plasma volumes and to analyze samples from a controlled study with MDMA.

Methods: The analytes were extracted from ≤0.2 mL of plasma by mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. After derivatization with S-(–)-heptafluorobutyrylprolyl chloride, the resulting diastereomers were separated by gas chromatography (HP-5MS) within 17 min and detected by mass spectrometry in the negative-ion chemical ionization mode. The method was fully validated and applied to samples from a controlled study in which a single dose of racemic MDMA (75 mg) was administered.

Results: The derivatized enantiomers were well separated and detected with good sensitivity. The assay was linear (per enantiomer) at 1–50 µg/L for MDA and 5–250 µg/L for MDMA and MDEA. Analytical recovery, accuracy, repeatability, and intermediate precision data were within required limits. Extraction yields were 82.1%–95.3%. In the study samples, concentrations of R-(–)-MDMA significantly exceeded those of S-(+)-MDMA. Their ratios (R vs S) were always >1.0 and increased over time. Concentrations of S-(+)-MDA exceeded those of R-(–)-MDA, their ratios (R vs S) also increasing over time but remaining <1.0.

Conclusions: This assay enables sensitive, reliable, and fast enantioselective measurement of MDA, MDMA, and MDEA in small volumes of plasma. The controlled study data confirm previous findings of MDMA and MDA enantiomer ratios (R vs S) increasing over time after ingestion of racemic MDMA.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
M. R. Meyer, F. T. Peters, and H. H. Maurer
The Role of Human Hepatic Cytochrome P450 Isozymes in the Metabolism of Racemic 3,4-Methylenedioxy-Methamphetamine and Its Enantiomers
Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2008; 36(11): 2345 - 2354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. A. Kolbrich, R. H. Lowe, and M. A. Huestis
Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography/Electron-Impact Mass Spectrometry with Cryofocusing for Simultaneous Quantification of MDMA, MDA, HMMA, HMA, and MDEA in Human Plasma
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2008; 54(2): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
F. T. Peters, N. Samyn, T. Kraemer, W. J. Riedel, and H. H. Maurer
Negative-Ion Chemical Ionization Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Assay for Enantioselective Measurement of Amphetamines in Oral Fluid: Application to a Controlled Study with MDMA and Driving Under the Influence Cases
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 702 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. O. Pirnay, T. T. Abraham, and M. A. Huestis
Sensitive Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Method for Simultaneous Measurement of MDEA, MDMA, and Metabolites HMA, MDA, and HMMA in Human Urine
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2006; 52(9): 1728 - 1734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.