Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 51: 2326-2332, 2005. First published October 13, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.058339
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2005.058339v1
51/12/2326    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solberg, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lahti, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solberg, H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lahti, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Informatics and Statistics
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:2326-2332.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

General Clinical Chemistry

Detection of Outliers in Reference Distributions: Performance of Horn’s Algorithm

Helge Erik Solberg1,a and Ari Lahti2

1 Department of Medical Biochemistry, Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet HF, Oslo, Norway.
2 Department of General Psychiatry, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Bergersletta 28, N-1349 Rykkinn, Norway. E-mail heesolbe{at}online.no.

Background: Medical laboratory reference data may be contaminated with outliers that should be eliminated before estimation of the reference interval. A statistical test for outliers has been proposed by Paul S. Horn and coworkers (Clin Chem 2001;47:2137–45). The algorithm operates in 2 steps: (a) mathematically transform the original data to approximate a gaussian distribution; and (b) establish detection limits (Tukey fences) based on the central part of the transformed distribution.

Methods: We studied the specificity of Horn’s test algorithm (probability of false detection of outliers), using Monte Carlo computer simulations performed on 13 types of probability distributions covering a wide range of positive and negative skewness. Distributions with 3% of the original observations replaced by random outliers were used to also examine the sensitivity of the test (probability of detection of true outliers). Three data transformations were used: the Box and Cox function (used in the original Horn’s test), the Manly exponential function, and the John and Draper modulus function.

Results: For many of the probability distributions, the specificity of Horn’s algorithm was rather poor compared with the theoretical expectation. The cause for such poor performance was at least partially related to remaining nongaussian kurtosis (peakedness). The sensitivity showed great variation, dependent on both the type of underlying distribution and the location of the outliers (upper and/or lower tail).

Conclusion: Although Horn’s algorithm undoubtedly is an improvement compared with older methods for outlier detection, reliable statistical identification of outliers in reference data remains a challenge.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.