|
|
||||||||
General Clinical Chemistry |
Clinical Chemistry Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Laboratory Medicine, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 10, Rm. 2C-433, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892-1508. Fax 301-402-1885; e-mail aremaley{at}nih.gov.
Background: Increased total triiodothyronine (TT3) assay results in apparently euthyroid patients triggered an investigation of the effect of blood collection tubes on serum TT3 and other laboratory assays.
Methods: We examined potential assay interference for three types of tubes: plastic Greiner Bio-OneTM VacuetteTM; glass Becton Dickinson (BD) VacutainerTM; and plastic BD Vacutainer SSTTM tubes. Serum samples from apparently healthy volunteers (age range, 3060 years; 15 males and 34 females) were collected in different tube types and analyzed in 17 immunoassays (n = 49), 30 clinical chemistry tests (n = 20), and 33 immunology assays (n = 15). Tube effects were also examined by adding pooled serum to different tube types.
Results: TT3 values, when measured by the IMMULITETM 2000 but not the AxSYMTM analyzer, were significantly higher (P <0.0001) for SST (2.81 nmol/L) than either glass (2.15 nmol/L) or Vacuette (2.24 nmol/L) tubes. The effect was large enough to substantially shift the distribution of patient values, increasing the percentage of values above the reference interval from 11.3% to 35.8%. The degree of interference from SST tubes on TT3 differed among various tube lots and could be attributed to a tube additive shared by other plastic tubes. Results from several other tests statistically differed among tube types, but differences were not considered to be clinically significant.
Conclusions: Assay interferences from blood collection tubes represent challenges to clinical laboratories because they are not detected by the usual quality-control or proficiency testing programs. Laboratories can, however, address this problem by monitoring distribution of patients results.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
A. K. Stankovic and G. Parmar Assay interferences from blood collection tubes: a cautionary note. Clin. Chem., August 1, 2006; 52(8): 1627 - 1628. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wang, V. Ho, A. Roquemore-Goins, and F. A. Smith Effects of Blood Collection Tubes, including Pediatric Devices, on 16 Common Immunoassays. Clin. Chem., May 1, 2006; 52(5): 892 - 893. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Kricka, J. Y. Park, M. B. Senior, and R. Fontanilla Processing Controls in Blood Collection Tubes Reveals Interference Clin. Chem., December 1, 2005; 51(12): 2422 - 2423. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Kricka and J. Y. Park Additive-Aggravated Assays: An Authoritative Answer Clin. Chem., October 1, 2005; 51(10): 1767 - 1767. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A.R. Bowen, Y. Chan, M. E. Ruddel, G. L. Hortin, G. Csako, S. J. Demosky Jr, and A. T. Remaley Immunoassay Interference by a Commonly Used Blood Collection Tube Additive, the Organosilicone Surfactant Silwet L-720 Clin. Chem., October 1, 2005; 51(10): 1874 - 1882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. T. Holmes, A. Levin, B. Forer, and F. Rosenberg Preanalytical Influences on DPC IMMULITE 2000 Intact PTH Assays of Plasma and Serum from Dialysis Patients Clin. Chem., May 1, 2005; 51(5): 915 - 917. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |