Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 51: 825-829, 2005. First published March 11, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2004.044883
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2004.044883v1
51/5/825    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kline, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez-Nino, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kline, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez-Nino, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
Right arrow Hemostasis and Thrombosis
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:825-829.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Hemostasis and Thrombosis

D-Dimer Concentrations in Normal Pregnancy: New Diagnostic Thresholds Are Needed

Jeffrey A. Kline1,a, Ginger W. Williams2 and Jackeline Hernandez-Nino2

Departments of1 Emergency Medicine and 2 Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Emergency Medicine Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, PO Box 32861, Charlotte, NC 28323-2861. Fax 704-355-7047; e-mail Jkline{at}carolina.rr.com.

Background: Pregnancy is known to increase the D-dimer concentration above the conventional normal threshold of 0.50 mg/L, leading to an increased false-positive D-dimer test when venous thromboembolism (VTE) is clinically suspected in a pregnant patient. Our aim was to determine the effect of normal pregnancy on the D-dimer concentration.

Methods: Healthy women who were seeking to become pregnant and had no preexisting condition known to increase the D-dimer concentration were identified. Quantitative D-dimer measurements (MDA turbidimetric assay) and fibrinogen assays were performed before conception, at each trimester, and at 4 weeks postpartum. Patients were excluded for fetal loss or preeclampsia.

Results: A total of 50 women were enrolled in the study, and blood samples were obtained at preconception and all trimesters from 23 women. The mean (SD) preconception D-dimer concentration was 0.43 (0.49) mg/L, and 79% of women had a D-dimer concentration <0.50 mg/L. D-Dimer increased with each trimester such that only 22% of women in the second trimester and none (of 23) in the third trimester (95% confidence interval, 0–14%) had a D-dimer concentration <0.50 mg/L. We found no correlation between either the D-dimer and fibrinogen concentrations or between the increases in D-dimer and fibrinogen with pregnancy.

Conclusions: Normal pregnancy causes a progressive increase in circulating D-dimer. The D-dimer test has no use in ruling out VTE in the third trimester if a cutoff of 0.50 mg/L is used. A large management study is needed to establish new thresholds for the D-dimer to rule out VTE in each trimester.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
W.-S. Chan, S. Chunilal, A. Lee, M. Crowther, M. Rodger, and J. S. Ginsberg
A Red Blood Cell Agglutination D-Dimer Test to Exclude Deep Venous Thrombosis in Pregnancy
Ann Intern Med, August 7, 2007; 147(3): 165 - 170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S Matthews
Imaging pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: what is the most appropriate imaging protocol?
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2006; 79(941): 441 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.