HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplements A correction has been published All Versions of this Article: clinchem.2005.047787v1 51/7/1232    most recent Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grossi, E. Articles by Franzini, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Grossi, E. Articles by Franzini, C. Related Collections Laboratory Management General Clinical Chemistry

The REALAB Project: A New Method for the Formulation of Reference Intervals Based on Current Data

¹ Research & Development and ² Central Laboratory, Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
³ Lombardy Cancer Registry and Environmental Epidemiology, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy.
⁴ Department of Clinical Sciences Luigi Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

^aAddress correspondence to this author at: Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche L. Sacco, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157 Milan, Italy. Fax 39-02-3564-018; e-mail carlo.franzini{at}unimi.it.

Background: In a primary healthcare center concerned more with maintaining wellness than with diagnosing and monitoring illness, it is particularly important to compare patients’ results with reference intervals derived from a matched population by use of defined statistical methods.

Methods: Laboratory results over a 3-year period (15 000 000 records; 197 350 individuals) were retrieved from our laboratory information system. An inclusion/exclusion procedure for individual patients was applied based on (a) presence of at least 1 of 23 previously defined "basic tests"; (b) only 1 measurement per test by the laboratory over the 3-year period; (c) for each test, absence of any abnormality in the correlated tests. Before the third step, correlations among quantities were assessed by a Spearman correlation matrix, comparing each of the 23 basic tests with all remaining tests by use of a novel multivariate algorithm.

Results: The initial sample group (n = 197 350) was reduced stepwise by the selection criteria outlined above to 166 027, then to 93 649, and finally to 61 246 individuals constituting our reference sample group. Results from the last 2 groups were used to calculate sex-specific, and in some cases age-related, reference limits for the 23 basic tests and for 13 additional quantities. Reference limits were calculated throughout this study by nonparametric estimation of percentiles.

Conclusion: Reference values derived by retrospective analysis of large samples of data obtained at a given institution are particularly suitable for the evaluation of results for the presenting patient population at that institution.

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				D. J. Herrera, K. Morris, C. Johnston, and P. Griffiths Automated assay for plasma D-lactate by enzymatic spectrophotometric analysis with sample blank correction Ann Clin Biochem, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 177 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Giavarina, R. M. Dorizzi, and G. Soffiati Indirect Methods for Reference Intervals Based on Current Data Clin. Chem., February 1, 2006; 52(2): 335 - 337. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Grossi, R. Colombo, S. Cavuto, and C. Franzini Indirect Methods for Reference Intervals Based on Current Data: The authors of the article cited above respond: Clin. Chem., February 1, 2006; 52(2): 337 - 338. [Full Text] [PDF]