HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: clinchem.2005.052019v1 51/8/1411    most recent Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hortin, G. L. Articles by Meilinger, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hortin, G. L. Articles by Meilinger, B. Related Collections Proteomics and Protein Markers

Cross-Reactivity of Amino Acids and Other Compounds in the Biuret Reaction: Interference with Urinary Peptide Measurements

¹ Department of Laboratory Medicine, Warren Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

^aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Laboratory Medicine, NIH, Bldg. 10, Room 2C-407, Bethesda, MD 20892-1508. Fax 301-402-1885; e-mail ghortin{at}mail.cc.nih.gov.

Background: Biuret assays for total protein measurement are considered to react with all peptides longer than 2 residues. Some studies using biuret assays of urine suggest that small peptides generally are more abundant than proteins in urine, but it is not clear whether this is a problem of assay specificity.

Methods: We analyzed the specificity and kinetics of a biuret reaction for solutions of amino acids, organic compounds, peptides, proteins, and ultrafiltered urine specimens and compared the results with standard clinical assays for protein measurement.

Results: The biuret assay cross-reacted with several amino acids, dipeptides, and other organic compounds able to form 5- or 6-member ring chelation complexes with copper. Reactions with amino acids and dipeptides had higher absorbance maxima (blue color) than with larger peptides and proteins (purple). Compounds forming potential 4-, 7-, 8-, or 9-member ring complexes with copper had low reactivity. Amino acid amides, dipeptides, and longer peptides had substantial reactivity, except those containing proline. Proteins and polypeptides had similar biuret reactivities per peptide bond, but reaction kinetics were slower for proteins than peptides. Urine specimens ultrafiltered through 3-kDa–cutoff membranes had substantial biuret reactivity, but absorbance maxima were consistent with cross-reactive amino acids rather than peptides.

Conclusions: Many compounds, including amino acids, amino acid derivatives, and dipeptides, cross-react in biuret assays. Our studies improve understanding of the specificity of endpoint and kinetic biuret assays widely used in clinical laboratories. Amino acids, urea, and creatinine contribute to overestimation of urinary peptide content by biuret assays.

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				D. Sviridov, S. K. Drake, and G. L. Hortin Reactivity of Urinary Albumin (Microalbumin) Assays with Fragmented or Modified Albumin Clin. Chem., January 1, 2008; 54(1): 61 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]