|
|
||||||||
Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization |
1 Department of Cardiology and 2
Institute for Clinical Chemistry, CharitéUniversity Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
3 James Cook University, School of Public Health/Tropical Medicine, Townsville, Australia.
4 Klinikum Oldenburg, Institute for Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology, Oldenburg, Germany.
5 University Hospital Mainz, Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine and6
Medical Clinic II, Mainz, Germany.
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Cardiology, CharitéUniversity Medicine Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany. Fax 49-30-450-553927; e-mail martin.moeckel{at}charite.de.
Background: Natriuretic peptides are promising markers in diagnosing acute and chronic heart failure and assessing prognosis in these patients. Increasing routine use to unselected patients is challenged by false-positive results. The aims of this study were to assess (a) the distributions of N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) values in various diagnostic groups, (b) factors that influence NT-proBNP, and (c) the value of NT-proBNP in risk stratification in unselected emergency room (ER) patients.
Methods: NT-proBNP was measured in 876 unselected consecutive patients [mean (SD) age, 58 (18) years; 53% male] attending the ERs of 2 university hospitals and 1 community hospital. Diagnoses, age, sex, hemoglobin, creatinine (CREA), C-reactive protein (CRP), troponin T, and intensity of care were documented. In a subset consisting of all 417 patients at 1 center, in-hospital follow-up was completed with respect to a complicated clinical course, including intensive care treatment and death.
Results: NT-proBNP was significantly increased in patients with cardiac diagnoses or histories compared with patients with only pulmonary or other diagnoses. In patients with other diagnoses, NT-proBNP values increased significantly with the number of atherosclerotic risk factors (P = 0.044). Age, renal function, CRP, and to a much lesser extent, hemoglobin significantly influenced NT-proBNP values. The amount of care was positively correlated with NT-proBNP (P <0.001). Classification and regression tree analysis showed a superior impact of NT-proBNP for identification of high-risk patients.
Conclusions: NT-proBNP is a promising marker for identification of patients with structural heart disease in the ER and a suitable tool for risk stratification. Its use in the ER should be limited to clearly clinically defined patient groups at present to avoid a potential excess of additional diagnostic procedures in positive but asymptomatic patients.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
D. Goei, W.-J. Flu, S. E. Hoeks, W. Galal, M. Dunkelgrun, E. Boersma, R. Kuijper, J.-P. van Kuijk, T. A. Winkel, O. Schouten, et al. The Interrelationship Between Preoperative Anemia and N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide: The Effect on Predicting Postoperative Cardiac Outcome in Vascular Surgery Patients Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1403 - 1408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nybo, M. Benn, R. Mogelvang, J. S. Jensen, P. Schnohr, J. F. Rehfeld, and J. P. Goetze Impact of Hemoglobin on Plasma Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Concentrations in the General Population Clin. Chem., November 1, 2007; 53(11): 1921 - 1927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Metra, S. Nodari, G. Parrinello, C. Specchia, L. Brentana, P. Rocca, F. Fracassi, T. Bordonali, P. Milani, R. Danesi, et al. The role of plasma biomarkers in acute heart failure. Serial changes and independent prognostic value of NT-proBNP and cardiac troponin-T Eur J Heart Fail, August 1, 2007; 9(8): 776 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Coste, P. Jourdain, and J. Pouchot A Gray Zone Assigned to Inconclusive Results of Quantitative Diagnostic Tests: Application to the Use of Brain Natriuretic Peptide for Diagnosis of Heart Failure in Acute Dyspneic Patients Clin. Chem., December 1, 2006; 52(12): 2229 - 2235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |