Clinical Chemistry Siemens Point of Care - Urinalysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 52: 345-351, 2006. First published January 12, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.059832
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2005.059832v1
52/3/345    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duffy, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duffy, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002)
(Clinical Chemistry. 2006;52:345-351.)
© 2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Minireview

Serum Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer: Are They of Clinical Value?

Michael J. Duffy

1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent’s University Hospital; UCD School of Medicine and Medical Science, Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin; and Dublin Molecular Medicine Institute, Dublin, Ireland.

Address for correspondence: Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. Fax 353-1-2696018; e-mail Michael.J.Duffy{at}ucd.ie.


Abstract

Background: Although multiple serum-based tumor markers have been described for breast cancer, such as CA 15-3, BR 27.29 (CA27.29), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polypeptide antigen, tissue polypeptide specific antigen, and HER-2 (the extracellular domain), the most widely used are CA 15-3 and CEA.

Methods: The literature relevant to serum tumor markers in breast cancer was reviewed. Particular attention was given to systematic reviews, prospective randomized trials, and guidelines issued by expert panels.

Results: Because of a lack of sensitivity for early disease and lack of specificity, none of the available markers is of value for the detection of early breast cancer. High preoperative concentrations of CA 15-3 are, however, associated with adverse patient outcome. Although serial determinations of tumor markers after primary treatment for breast cancer can preclinically detect recurrent/metastatic disease with lead times of ~2–9 months, the clinical value of this lead time remains to be determined. Serum markers, however, are the only validated approach for monitoring treatment in patients with advanced disease that cannot be evaluated by use of conventional criteria.

Conclusions: CA 15-3 is one of the first circulating prognostic factors for breast cancer. Preoperative concentrations thus might be combined with existing prognostic factors for predicting outcome in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. At present, the most important clinical application of CA 15-3 is in monitoring therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer that is not assessable by existing clinical or radiologic procedures.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. M. Sturgeon, M. J. Duffy, U.-H. Stenman, H. Lilja, N. Brunner, D. W. Chan, R. Babaian, R. C. Bast Jr., B. Dowell, F. J. Esteva, et al.
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2008; 54(12): e11 - e79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
U. M Abd Hamid, L. Royle, R. Saldova, C. M Radcliffe, D. J Harvey, S. J Storr, M. Pardo, R. Antrobus, C. J Chapman, N. Zitzmann, et al.
A strategy to reveal potential glycan markers from serum glycoproteins associated with breast cancer progression
Glycobiology, December 1, 2008; 18(12): 1105 - 1118.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. J. Duffy and J. Crown
A Personalized Approach to Cancer Treatment: How Biomarkers Can Help
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2008; 54(11): 1770 - 1779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
Z. Kyselova, Y. Mechref, P. Kang, J. A. Goetz, L. E. Dobrolecki, G. W. Sledge, L. Schnaper, R. J. Hickey, L. H. Malkas, and M. V. Novotny
Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis through Quantitative Measurements of Serum Glycan Profiles
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2008; 54(7): 1166 - 1175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
B.-W. Park, J.-W. Oh, J.-H. Kim, S. H. Park, K.-S. Kim, J. H. Kim, and K. S. Lee
Preoperative CA 15-3 and CEA serum levels as predictor for breast cancer outcomes
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 675 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. Tang, R. Yuan, and Y. Chai
Magnetic Control of an Electrochemical Microfluidic Device with an Arrayed Immunosensor for Simultaneous Multiple Immunoassays
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2007; 53(7): 1323 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
C. Kirmiz, B. Li, H. J. An, B. H. Clowers, H. K. Chew, K. S. Lam, A. Ferrige, R. Alecio, A. D. Borowsky, S. Sulaimon, et al.
A Serum Glycomics Approach to Breast Cancer Biomarkers
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2007; 6(1): 43 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.