|
|
||||||||
Endocrinology and Metabolism |
1 Department of Clinical Chemistry and 2
Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
3 Department of Internal Medicine, Peijas Hospital, Vantaa, Finland.
4 Department of Internal Medicine, Jorvi Hospital, Espoo, Finland.
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Clinical Chemistry, Helsinki University Hospital, FIN-00290 Helsinki, Finland. Fax 358-9-471-74806; e-mail helene.markkanen{at}hus.fi.
Background: Diagnosis and follow-up of acromegaly is based on measurements of serum growth hormone (GH) concentrations during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). A nadir value <1 µg/L is commonly used to define a normal response, but some authors suggest lower cutoff values.
Methods: To compare the results and subsequent patient classification obtained with 3 GH assays, we obtained basal serum samples from 78 apparently healthy adult controls (43 women and 35 men; median age, 32.5 years) and from 71 treated (44 women and 27 men; median age, 55.2 years) and 7 untreated acromegaly patients (4 women and 3 men; median age, 54.6 years), and OGTT was performed on all patients and on 72 of the 78 controls. GH was determined by 2 immunometric assaysa double monoclonal (AutoDELFIA; Wallac) and a monopolyclonal (Immulite 2000; DPC) assayand in a limited set of samples by an RIA (Spectria RIA; Orion).
Results: There was a strong correlation (r = 0.995; P <0.001) between the 2 immunometric methods, but the results obtained with the Immulite 2000 were, on average, 1.4-fold higher than those obtained with the AutoDELFIA. At concentrations around the cutoff (1 µg/L), however, the difference was
2-fold. Overall, the Orion RIA method also showed a good correlation (r = 0.9510.959) with the other methods, but it did not measure concentrations <2 µg/L. Women had higher basal and OGTT nadir GH concentrations than men.
Conclusion: Reference intervals should be determined separately for each method, and the need for establishing sex-specific reference values should be investigated.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
A. M. Arafat, M. Mohlig, M. O. Weickert, F. H. Perschel, J. Purschwitz, J. Spranger, C. J. Strasburger, C. Schofl, and A. F. H. Pfeiffer Growth Hormone Response during Oral Glucose Tolerance Test: The Impact of Assay Method on the Estimation of Reference Values in Patients with Acromegaly and in Healthy Controls, and the Role of Gender, Age, and Body Mass Index J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2008; 93(4): 1254 - 1262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Schmid, P.-A. Krayenbuehl, R.-L. Bernays, C. Zwimpfer, F. E. Maly, and P. Wiesli Growth Hormone (GH) Receptor Isoform in Acromegaly: Lower Concentrations of GH but Not Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 in Patients with a Genomic Deletion of Exon 3 in the GH Receptor Gene Clin. Chem., August 1, 2007; 53(8): 1484 - 1488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pazaitou-Panayiotou, T. Kelesidis, I. Kelesidis, A. Kaprara, J. Blakeman, I. Vainas, A. Mpousoulegas, C. J Williams, and C. Mantzoros Growth hormone-binding protein is directly and IGFBP-3 is inversely associated with risk of female breast cancer Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2007; 156(2): 187 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kauppinen-Makelin, T. Sane, H. Sintonen, H. Markkanen, M. J. Valimaki, E. Loyttyniemi, L. Niskanen, A. Reunanen, U.-H. Stenman, and and the Finnish Acromegaly Study Group Quality of Life in Treated Patients with Acromegaly J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3891 - 3896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |