|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Endocrinology and Metabolism |
1 Clinical Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, and2 Section of Surgical Endocrinology, Division of General Surgery, General Hospital of the Medical University and City of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Clinical Institute for Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, EB05, General Hospital of the Medical University and City of Vienna, Waeringer Guertel 18-20, A 1090 Vienna, Austria. Fax 43-1-40400-6752; e-mail christian.bieglmayer{at}meduniwien.ac.at.
Background: Commonly used assays for intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) detect not only the biologically active 84amino acid hormone [PTH(184)], but cross-react with an N-terminaltruncated fragment. Because iPTH assays often fail to predict success of parathyroidectomy in patients with renal hyperparathyroidism (rHPT), we compared results of a 3rd-generation PTH(184) assay (Bio-iPTH; Nichols Institute Diagnostics) with two 2nd-generation iPTH assays (from Nichols and Roche Diagnostics) by evaluating the PTH clearance kinetics during surgical treatment.
Methods: We collected blood samples in short time intervals from 35 consecutive surgical patients with rHPT. Three patients had to be excluded from further calculations; the remainder were grouped according to kidney function and postoperative outcome. All samples were analyzed with the 3 automated PTH assays, which have different specificities.
Results: Twenty minutes after removal of the last gland, the PTH(184) values decreased to within the reference intervals in all patients with total and subtotal resection; however, iPTH concentrations normalized in only one half of these patients. In patients with poor renal function, the half-life of PTH(184) was shorter than the half-lives obtained with the iPTH assays.
Conclusions: The accuracy of PTH monitoring during surgery for rHPT depends on renal function and assay specificity. All assays tested showed similar effectiveness in detecting missed glands, but the assay for PTH(184) gave more reliable results than the iPTH assays, which overestimated the concentration of PTH and hampered the intrasurgical diagnosis of resection sufficiency.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
S.-K. Meyer, M. Zorn, K. Frank-Raue, M. W Buchler, P. Nawroth, and T. Weber Clinical impact of two different intraoperative parathyroid hormone assays in primary and renal hyperparathyroidism Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2009; 160(2): 275 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Q. Khan, O. S. Dhillon, R. J. O'Brien, J. Struck, P. A. Quinn, N. G. Morgenthaler, I. B. Squire, J. E. Davies, A. Bergmann, and L. L. Ng C-Terminal Provasopressin (Copeptin) as a Novel and Prognostic Marker in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Leicester Acute Myocardial Infarction Peptide (LAMP) Study Circulation, April 24, 2007; 115(16): 2103 - 2110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |