|
|
||||||||
Technical Briefs |
1 Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium;2 Laboratory for Hormonology and Department of Endocrinology, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium;
aaddress correspondence to this author at: Laboratory for Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Harelbekestraat 72, B-9000 Gent, Belgium; fax 32-9-264-81-98, e-mail linda.thienpont{at}ugent.be
Abstract
Background: Serum C-peptide concentrations reflect pancreatic function in different clinical and diagnostic settings; however, the utility of C-peptide testing is limited by the lack of standardized commercial immunoassays. Standardization can best be done by split-sample comparison with a hierarchically higher reference measurement procedure with a set of native sera. For serum peptides, isotope-dilution liquid chromatographymass spectrometry (ID-LC/MS) is recommended as a reference measurement procedure.
Methods: We evaluated the analytical performance characteristics of an ID-LC/tandem MS procedure for measurement of serum C-peptide after a 2-step solid-phase extraction. To investigate the feasibility of this procedure for use in standardization, we also performed a method comparison with 3 representative commercial assays.
Results: The ID-LC/tandem MS procedure showed maximum within-run, between-run, and total CVs on dedicated sera (C-peptide concentrations, 1.6 and 4.0 µg/L) of 2.1%, 2.5%, and 2.9%, respectively; an accuracy of 94.6%104.1%; a minimum trueness of 98.1% (95% confidence interval, 96.2%100.0%), and limits of quantification and detection of 0.15 and 0.03 µg/L, respectively. Deming linear regression analysis of the method-comparison data showed that the immunoassays correlated well with ID-MS and were specific, but lacked intercomparability and trueness. We propose that the deficiencies can be resolved by recalibration on the basis of the method comparison.
Conclusions: The ID-LC/tandem MS procedure is suitable for specific and accurate measurement of basal and stimulated serum concentrations of proinsulin C-peptide fragment 3363 and is suitable for use in standardization of C-peptide immunoassays.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
R. R. Little, C. L. Rohlfing, A. L. Tennill, R. W. Madsen, K. S. Polonsky, G. L. Myers, C. J. Greenbaum, J. P. Palmer, E. Rogatsky, and D. T. Stein Standardization of C-Peptide Measurements Clin. Chem., June 1, 2008; 54(6): 1023 - 1026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Hortin A New Era in Protein Quantification in Clinical Laboratories: Application of Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 543 - 544. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Marcovina, R. R. Bowsher, W. G. Miller, M. Staten, G. Myers, S. P. Caudill, S. E. Campbell, M. W. Steffes, and for the Insulin Standardization Workgroup Standardization of Insulin Immunoassays: Report of the American Diabetes Association Workgroup Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 711 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-M. Wiedmeyer, K. S. Polonsky, G. L. Myers, R. R. Little, C. J. Greenbaum, D. E. Goldstein, and J. P. Palmer International Comparison of C-Peptide Measurements Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 784 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |