Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 53: 8-16, 2007. First published November 27, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.074591
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow 074591.Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.074591v1
53/1/8    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Humphries, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, G. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:8-16.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics

Candidate Gene Genotypes, Along with Conventional Risk Factor Assessment, Improve Estimation of Coronary Heart Disease Risk in Healthy UK Men

Steve E. Humphries1,a, Jackie A. Cooper1, Philippa J. Talmud1 and George J. Miller2

1 Centre for Cardiovascular Genetics, Department of Medicine, British Heart Foundation Laboratories, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, United Kingdom.
2 Medical Research Council Cardiovascular Group, Department of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Centre for Cardiovascular Genetics, Department of Medicine, British Heart Foundation Laboratories, Rayne Bldg., Royal Free and University College Medical School, 5 University St., London WC1E 6JF, United Kingdom. Fax 0107-679-6212; e-mail rmhaseh{at}ucl.ac.uk.

Background: One of the aims of cardiovascular genetics is to test the efficacy of the use of genetic information to predict cardiovascular risk. We therefore investigated whether inclusion of a set of common variants in candidate genes along with conventional risk factor (CRF) assessment enhanced coronary heart disease (CHD)-risk algorithms.

Methods: We followed middle-aged men in the prospective Northwick Park Heart Study II (NPHSII) for 10.8 years and analyzed complete trait and genotype information available on 2057 men (183 CHD events).

Results: Of the 12 genes previously associated with CHD risk, in stepwise multivariate risk analysis, uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2; P = 0.0001), apolipoprotein E (APOE; P = 0.0003), lipoprotein lipase (LPL; P = 0.007), and apolipoprotein AIV (APOA4; P = 0.04) remained in the model. Their combined area under the ROC curve (AROC) was 0.62 (0.58–0.66) [12.6% detection rate for a 5% false positive rate (DR5)]. The AROC for the CRFs age, triglyceride, cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, and smoking was 0.66 (0.61–0.70) (DR5 = 14.2%). Combining CRFs and genotypes significantly improved discrimination (P = 0.001). Inclusion of previously demonstrated interactions of smoking with LPL, interleukin-6 (IL6), and platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule (PECAM1) genotypes increased the AROC to 0.72 (0.68–0.76) for a DR5 of 19.1% (P = 0.01 vs CRF combined with genotypes).

Conclusions: For a modest panel of selected genotypes, CHD-risk estimates incorporating CRFs and genotype–risk factor interactions were more effective than risk estimates that used CRFs alone.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
R. Leidl
Promoting economic value in public health
Eur J Public Health, June 1, 2008; 18(3): 216 - 216.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. Kathiresan, O. Melander, D. Anevski, C. Guiducci, N. P. Burtt, C. Roos, J. N. Hirschhorn, G. Berglund, B. Hedblad, L. Groop, et al.
Polymorphisms Associated with Cholesterol and Risk of Cardiovascular Events
N. Engl. J. Med., March 20, 2008; 358(12): 1240 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. J. Talmud, J. A. Cooper, J. Palmen, R. Lovering, F. Drenos, A. D. Hingorani, and S. E. Humphries
Chromosome 9p21.3 Coronary Heart Disease Locus Genotype and Prospective Risk of CHD in Healthy Middle-Aged Men
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2008; 54(3): 467 - 474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.