|
|
||||||||
Clinical Immunology |
1 Department of Medicine, Hospital de Gastroenterología "Dr. Carlos Bonorino Udaondo", Buenos Aires, Argentina.
2 Pathology Service, Department of Medicine, Hospital de Gastroenterologiá, "Dr. Carlos Bonorino Udaondo", Buenos Aires, Argentina.
3 Unidad de Soporte Nutricional y Malabsorción, Hospital San Martín, La Plata, Argentina.
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Medicine, Hospital de Gastroenterología "Carlos Bonorino Udaondo", Av. Caseros 2061, 1264 Buenos Aires, Argentina. Fax 54-11-4304-1018; e-mail jbai{at}intramed.net.
Background: Noninvasive serologic tests have shown high diagnostic accuracy for celiac disease (CD) in selected populations. Our aim was to determine prospectively the performance of CD-related serology in individuals undergoing intestinal biopsy because of clinical suspicion of small-bowel disorders.
Methods: We enrolled 141 unselected consecutive adult patients attending a small-bowel disease clinic. Patients underwent endoscopy and biopsy; serum samples were obtained at that time for measurements of anti–tissue transglutaminase (a-tTG), IgA and IgG anti–deamidated gliadin-related peptide (a-DGP), and IgA antiactin antibodies (AAAs). Characterization of patients was based on histological criteria (Marsh type II lesion or greater).
Results: The prevalence of CD was 42.5%. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were >90% for most assays. Diagnostic accuracy based on ROC curve analysis was similar for all assays [area under the curve (95% CI): 0.996 (0.967–0.998) for a-tTG, 0.995 (0.964–0.998) for IgA a-DGP, 0.989 (0.954–0.999) for IgG a-DGP, 0.996 (0.966–0.998) for blended conjugated of IgA + IgG a-DGP in a single assay, and 0.967 (0.922–0.990) for AAA]. The combinations of 2 tests, IgG a-DGP plus IgA a-tTG or the single blended conjugate detecting IgA + IgG a-DGP plus IgA a-tTG had 100% positive and negative predictive values if concentrations of both tests in either combination were above or below the cutoff.
Conclusions: In a population with high pretest probability, the newly developed a-DGP tests have diagnostic accuracy that is at least equivalent to that of established assays.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |