Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 53: 735-741, 2007. First published February 15, 2007; 10.1373/clinchem.2006.081174
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow 081174.Supplemental Data
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2006.081174v1
53/4/735    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Middleton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vaks, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Middleton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vaks, J. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:735-741.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Automation and Analytical Techniques

Evaluation of Assigned-Value Uncertainty for Complex Calibrator Value Assignment Processes: A Prealbumin Example

John Middleton1,a and Jeffrey E. Vaks2

1 Department of Clinical Chemistry Development, Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA.
2 Math/Stats Group, Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Clinical Chemistry Development, Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA. 92821. Fax 714-961-3740; email jsmiddleton{at}beckman.com.

Background: Errors of calibrator-assigned values lead to errors in the testing of patient samples. The ability to estimate the uncertainties of calibrator-assigned values and other variables minimizes errors in testing processes. International Organization of Standardization guidelines provide simple equations for the estimation of calibrator uncertainty with simple value-assignment processes, but other methods are needed to estimate uncertainty in complex processes.

Methods: We estimated the assigned-value uncertainty with a Monte Carlo computer simulation of a complex value-assignment process, based on a formalized description of the process, with measurement parameters estimated experimentally. This method was applied to study uncertainty of a multilevel calibrator value assignment for a prealbumin immunoassay.

Results: The simulation results showed that the component of the uncertainty added by the process of value transfer from the reference material CRM470 to the calibrator is smaller than that of the reference material itself (<0.8% vs 3.7%). Varying the process parameters in the simulation model allowed for optimizing the process, while keeping the added uncertainty small. The patient result uncertainty caused by the calibrator uncertainty was also found to be small.

Conclusions: This method of estimating uncertainty is a powerful tool that allows for estimation of calibrator uncertainty for optimization of various value assignment processes, with a reduced number of measurements and reagent costs, while satisfying the requirements to uncertainty. The new method expands and augments existing methods to allow estimation of uncertainty in complex processes.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.