Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 53: 1338-1342, 2007. First published May 24, 2007; 10.1373/clinchem.2007.088344
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2007.088344v1
53/7/1338    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carraro, P.
Right arrow Articles by Plebani, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carraro, P.
Right arrow Articles by Plebani, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
(Clinical Chemistry. 2007;53:1338-1342.)
© 2007 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Laboratory Management

Errors in a Stat Laboratory: Types and Frequencies 10 Years Later

Paolo Carraro and Mario Plebania

1 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera-Università and Azienda ULSS 16, Padova, Italy.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Medicina di Laboratorio, Azienda Ospedaliera-Università, via Giustiniani 2, 35128 Padova, Italy. Fax 39-049-663240; e-mail mario.plebani{at}unipd.it.

Background: In view of increasing attention focused on patient safety and the need to reduce laboratory errors, it is important that clinical laboratories collect statistics on error occurrence rates over the whole testing cycle, including pre-, intra-, and postanalytical phases.

Methods: The present study was conducted in 2006 according to the design we previously used in 1996 to monitor the error rates for laboratory testing in 4 different departments (internal medicine, nephrology, surgery, and intensive care). For 3 months, physicians and nurses were asked to pay careful attention to all test results. Any suspected laboratory error was recorded with associated pertinent clinical information. Every day, a laboratory physician visited the 4 departments and a critical appraisal was made of any suspect results.

Results: Among a total of 51 746 analyses, clinicians notified us of 393 questionable findings, 160 of which were confirmed as laboratory errors. The overall frequency of errors, 3092 ppm, was significantly lower (P <0.05) than in 1996 (4700 ppm). Of the 160 confirmed errors, 61.9% were preanalytical errors, 15% were analytical, and 23.1% were postanalytical.

Conclusions: During the last decade the error rates in our stat laboratory have been reduced significantly. As demonstrated by the distribution pattern, the pre- and postanalytical steps still have the highest error prevalences, but changes have occurred in the types and frequencies of errors in these phases of testing.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Ann Clin BiochemHome page
L. Nutt, A. E Zemlin, and R. T Erasmus
Incomplete laboratory request forms: the extent and impact on critical results at a tertiary hospital in South Africa
Ann Clin Biochem, September 1, 2008; 45(5): 463 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.