|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General Clinical Chemistry |
1 Department of Clinical Pharmacology,2 Division of Nephrology,3 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and4 Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. Fax 31-50-3619069; e-mail s.j.l.bakker{at}int.umcg.nl.
Background: Urinary albumin detection by immunonephelometry is decreased by
30% in samples that have been frozen at –20 °C. An HPLC method for assessment of urinary albumin that detects immunoreactive and immunochemically nonreactive albumin has been introduced as an alternative to immunonephelometry. We investigated whether this technique is affected by sample temperature, particularly freezing.
Methods: Urine samples (n = 295) were collected from the general population (Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-Stage Disease Study). Samples were assessed by both immunonephelometry and HPLC when fresh and after storage at –20 °C for 4, 8, and 12 months and at –80 °C for 12 months.
Results: With immunonephelometry, storage for 4, 8, and 12 months at –20 °C resulted in mean (SD) urine albumin changes of –21% (29%), –28% (29%), and –34% (31) (P <0.001 for trend). Storage at –80 °C resulted in a 5% (19%) change after 12 months of storage (not significant). With HPLC, storage for 4, 8, and 12 months at –20 °C resulted in urine albumin changes of –33% (28%), –43% (24%), and –55% (21%; P <0.001 vs immunonephelometry). Storage at –80 °C resulted in a –29% (29%) change (P <0.001 vs immunonephelometry).
Conclusion: Loss of albumin after freezing urine depends not only on freezing temperature but also on detection method. Detection of albumin by immunonephelometry appears to be significantly less influenced by freezing than detection by HPLC. Storage at –80 °C appears to prevent loss when using immunonephelometry, whereas HPLC still shows considerable loss even when urine is frozen at –80 °C. We propose that for reliable measurement of urine albumin, fresh samples should be used.
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
M. S. Graziani, G. Gambaro, L. Mantovani, A. Sorio, T. Yabarek, C. Abaterusso, A. Lupo, and P. Rizzotti Diagnostic accuracy of a reagent strip for assessing urinary albumin excretion in the general population Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1490 - 1494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Hallan, E. Ritz, S. Lydersen, S. Romundstad, K. Kvenild, and S. R. Orth Combining GFR and Albuminuria to Classify CKD Improves Prediction of ESRD J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2009; 20(5): 1069 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Miller, D. E. Bruns, G. L. Hortin, S. Sandberg, K. M. Aakre, M. J. McQueen, Y. Itoh, J. C. Lieske, D. W. Seccombe, G. Jones, et al. Current Issues in Measurement and Reporting of Urinary Albumin Excretion Clin. Chem., January 1, 2009; 55(1): 24 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sviridov, S. K. Drake, and G. L. Hortin Reactivity of Urinary Albumin (Microalbumin) Assays with Fragmented or Modified Albumin Clin. Chem., January 1, 2008; 54(1): 61 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |