HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: clinchem.2007.088823v1 53/8/1520    most recent Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brinkman, J. W. Articles by Bakker, S. J.L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Brinkman, J. W. Articles by Bakker, S. J.L. Related Collections General Clinical Chemistry

Apparent Loss of Urinary Albumin during Long-term Frozen Storage: HPLC vs Immunonephelometry

¹ Department of Clinical Pharmacology,² Division of Nephrology,³ Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and⁴ Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

^aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. Fax 31-50-3619069; e-mail s.j.l.bakker{at}int.umcg.nl.

Background: Urinary albumin detection by immunonephelometry is decreased by 30% in samples that have been frozen at –20 °C. An HPLC method for assessment of urinary albumin that detects immunoreactive and immunochemically nonreactive albumin has been introduced as an alternative to immunonephelometry. We investigated whether this technique is affected by sample temperature, particularly freezing.

Methods: Urine samples (n = 295) were collected from the general population (Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-Stage Disease Study). Samples were assessed by both immunonephelometry and HPLC when fresh and after storage at –20 °C for 4, 8, and 12 months and at –80 °C for 12 months.

Results: With immunonephelometry, storage for 4, 8, and 12 months at –20 °C resulted in mean (SD) urine albumin changes of –21% (29%), –28% (29%), and –34% (31) (P <0.001 for trend). Storage at –80 °C resulted in a 5% (19%) change after 12 months of storage (not significant). With HPLC, storage for 4, 8, and 12 months at –20 °C resulted in urine albumin changes of –33% (28%), –43% (24%), and –55% (21%; P <0.001 vs immunonephelometry). Storage at –80 °C resulted in a –29% (29%) change (P <0.001 vs immunonephelometry).

Conclusion: Loss of albumin after freezing urine depends not only on freezing temperature but also on detection method. Detection of albumin by immunonephelometry appears to be significantly less influenced by freezing than detection by HPLC. Storage at –80 °C appears to prevent loss when using immunonephelometry, whereas HPLC still shows considerable loss even when urine is frozen at –80 °C. We propose that for reliable measurement of urine albumin, fresh samples should be used.

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				D. Sviridov, S. K. Drake, and G. L. Hortin Reactivity of Urinary Albumin (Microalbumin) Assays with Fragmented or Modified Albumin Clin. Chem., January 1, 2008; 54(1): 61 - 68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]