Clinical Chemistry Siemens Point of Care - Urinalysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 54: 1883-1891, 2008. First published August 29, 2008; 10.1373/clinchem.2008.108761
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2008.108761v1
54/11/1883    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drammeh, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nguyen, P. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drammeh, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nguyen, P. H.
(Clinical Chemistry. 2008;54:1883-1891.)
© 2008 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

General Clinical Chemistry

Effects of Delayed Sample Processing and Freezing on Serum Concentrations of Selected Nutritional Indicators

Bakary S. Drammeh1, Rosemary L. Schleicher1, Christine M. Pfeiffer1,a, Ram B. Jain1, Mindy Zhang1 and Phuong Hong Nguyen2

1 National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; 2 Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy., MS F55, Atlanta, GA 30341. Fax 770-488-4139; e-mail CPfeiffer{at}cdc.gov.

Background: Environmental conditions during sample processing, shipping, and storage are often suboptimal, particularly in less developed countries. We used samples from US volunteers to investigate the effects of delayed whole blood (WB) processing and delayed freezing of serum on selected nutritional indicators.

Methods: WB tubes (n = 35) were either stored at 32 °C for up to 3 days before serum separation or centrifuged within 2 h of collection; serum samples were stored at 11 °C for up to 14 days to simulate delayed shipping. We assessed analyte stability by comparing results with data from optimally prepared/stored serum samples (<2 h on the clot, frozen at –70 °C) and by using clinical-acceptability criteria based on combined analytical imprecision and intraindividual biologic variability.

Results: Clinically acceptable changes in concentration varied from 3%–15%. Delayed WB processing did not unacceptably affect concentrations of carotenoids and vitamins B12, D, and E; however, we obtained clinically unacceptable changes for ferritin (+9%), soluble transferrin receptor (sTfR) (+5%), and folate (–30%) after 1 day, and for vitamin A (–10%) after 3 days. Delayed freezing of serum did not affect concentrations of ferritin, sTfR, carotenoids, and vitamins A, B12, and E; however, we obtained clinically unacceptable changes for vitamins C (–20%) and D (+7%) after 7 days and for folate after 14 days (–22%).

Conclusions: Despite substantial delays in WB processing or in the freezing of serum samples, most nutritional indicators showed remarkable stability. This information is important for both the design of field studies and the use of residual samples subjected to suboptimal preanalytical factors.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.