Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 54: 356-365, 2008. First published December 18, 2007; 10.1373/clinchem.2007.091843
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2007.091843v1
54/2/356    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ichihara, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ichihara, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
(Clinical Chemistry. 2008;54:356-365.)
© 2008 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


General Clinical Chemistry

Sources of Variation of Commonly Measured Serum Analytes in 6 Asian Cities and Consideration of Common Reference Intervals

Kiyoshi Ichihara1,a, Yoshihisa Itoh2, Christopher W. K. Lam3, Priscilla M. K. Poon3, Jeong-Ho Kim4, Hiroshi Kyono5, Naning Chandrawening6, Dewi Muliaty6 Science Committee for the Asian-Pacific Federation of Clinical Biochemistry

1 Faculty of Health Sciences, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Asahikawa Medical College, Asahikawa, Japan; 3 Department of Chemical Pathology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; 4 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea; 5 Yuan Ching Clinical Laboratory, Taipei, Taiwan; 6 Prodia Clinical Laboratory, Jakarta, Indonesia.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Minami-Kogushi 1–1-1, Ube, 755-8505 Japan. Fax +81-836-35-5213; e-mail ichihara{at}yamaguchi-u.ac.jp.

Background: In a previous study to determine the feasibility of common reference intervals in Asia, we found significant differences among populations from 6 cities. In this study, we attempted to define the sources of these differences.

Methods: We enrolled 580 healthy volunteers (279 men, 301 women, 20–62 years old), after a selection process that was based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines, and used a lifestyle questionnaire. All sera were obtained at a basal state and frozen at –80 °C until the collective assay was done. We measured 21 basic chemical analytes and 10 serum proteins.

Results: We used 3-level nested ANOVA to separate the variation (SD) into between-city (SD-city), between-sex (SD-sex), between-age (SD-age), and between-individual (SD-indiv) components. SD-indiv corresponds to one-quarter of the "pure" reference interval obtained after removing variations due to city, sex, and age. The SD-sex to SD-indiv ratio was >0.8 for creatinine, urate, retinol-binding protein, and transthyretin. We observed high SD-city to SD-indiv ratios, ranging from 0.4 to 0.7, for 11 analytes including lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), electrolytes, IgG, and complement components and SD-age to SD-indiv ratios >0.4 for LDH, alkaline phosphatase, and total cholesterol. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated several other relevant sources of variation, including body mass index, alcohol consumption, and cigarette smoking, although their contributions were generally smaller than those for sex, region, or age.

Conclusion: We observed unacceptably large regional differences in measured values of some analytes even after adjustment for age, sex, and lifestyle variables. Genetic and environmental factors may account for the residual differences.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
J. H Barth
Reference ranges still need further clarity
Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
F. Ceriotti, R. Hinzmann, and M. Panteghini
Reference intervals: the way forward
Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 8 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. C. Boyd
Cautions in the Adoption of Common Reference Intervals
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2008; 54(2): 238 - 239.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.