Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 54: 602-605, 2008; 10.1373/clinchem.2007.096685
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow HTML Page - index.htslp
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holtkamp, U.
Right arrow Articles by Blankenstein, O.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holtkamp, U.
Right arrow Articles by Blankenstein, O.
(Clinical Chemistry. 2008;54:602-605.)
© 2008 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Brief Communications

EDTA in Dried Blood Spots Leads to False Results in Neonatal Endocrinologic Screening

Ute Holtkamp1,a, Jeanette Klein2, Johannes Sander1, Michael Peter1, Nils Janzen1, Ulrike Steuerwald1 and Oliver Blankenstein2

1 Screening-Labor Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
2 Newborn Screening, Charite Children’s Hospital, Berlin, Germany;

aaddress correspondence to this author at: Screening-Labor Hannover, Postbox 91 10 09, D-30430 Hannover, Germany. Fax +40 5108 92163 19.


Abstract

Background: Blood samples for neonatal screening for inborn errors of metabolism are collected and shipped on standardized filter paper cards. Occasionally these samples are contaminated with EDTA, which is often used for anticoagulation. EDTA may interfere with newborn screening tests based on lanthanide fluorescence and thus lead to false-negative or false-positive results.

Methods: We used tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to detect EDTA in dried blood spots by use of an extra experiment that was integrated into the standard MS/MS neonatal screening and did not require an additional sample spot, nor extra time or work. We analyzed the influence of different blood sampling procedures on lanthanide fluorescence tests for thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP).

Results: EDTA was increased in 138 of 190 000 newborn screening samples, 27 of which caused false- positive results in the immunoassay for 17-OHP. No false-negative TSH results were found. False-positive results in the 17-OHP test occurred when EDTA concentrations were >2.0 g/L; the TSH test, however, produced false negatives only when EDTA concentrations were >3.0 g/L. Using EDTA-containing devices the procedure of blood collection significantly influenced the concentration of the anticoagulant.

Conclusion: Addition of EDTA quantification into standard MS/MS tests is a simple and useful method to avoid false-positive or false-negative neonatal screening results in lanthanide fluorescence–based tests.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.