HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shih, J. Articles by Möckel, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shih, J. Articles by Möckel, M.

Effect of Collection Tube Type and Preanalytical Handling on Myeloperoxidase Concentrations

¹ Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL; Departments of ² Cardiology, ³ Clinical Chemistry, and ⁴ Nephrology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Campus Virchow-Clinikum, Berlin, Germany

^aaddress correspondence to this author at: Abbott Laboratories, D-9L5 AP6C, 100 Abbott Park Road, Abbott Park, IL, 60064. Fax 847-937-5350; e-mail Jessie.Shih{at}abbott.com

Abstract

Background: Myeloperoxidase (MPO) has shown potential as a marker for cardiovascular disease. Limited studies have been published with a variety of sample types, resulting in a wide range of MPO values. Little is known or understood about the impact of collection tube type and preanalytical handling of specimens for MPO determination.

Method: MPO concentration was determined by use of the ARCHITECT® MPO research use assay, which is currently under development. Samples were collected into multiple anticoagulant collection tubes from donors and patients presenting to the emergency department with symptoms of acute coronary syndromes. Whole blood was stored on ice or at room temperature for predetermined time periods. We also evaluated serum and plasma after centrifugation followed by storage at room temperature, 2–8 °C, and below –10 °C.

Results: Baseline sample concentrations were dependent on collection tube type as well as handling conditions. MPO concentrations were consistently higher in samples collected in serum and heparin plasma tubes than in samples in EDTA or citrate tubes. Spike recovery was acceptable in all sera and plasma tested, indicating that the increased MPO concentrations were not due directly to an anticoagulant interference.

Conclusions: The collection tube type and preanalytical handling are critical for accurate and consistent MPO measurement. The preferred anticoagulant and tubes are the EDTA or EDTA plasma preparation tube. MPO concentrations in samples collected in these tubes are stable before centrifugation as whole blood as well as plasma after processing.

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				W.H. W. Tang Enhancing the Prognostic Value of Cardiac Imaging With Multimodal Risk Assessment J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., September 1, 2009; 2(9): 1100 - 1102. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. K. Schindhelm, L. P. van der Zwan, T. Teerlink, and P. G. Scheffer Myeloperoxidase: A Useful Biomarker for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification? Clin. Chem., August 1, 2009; 55(8): 1462 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. H.B. Wu Novel Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Disease: Myeloperoxidase for Acute and/or Chronic Heart Failure? Clin. Chem., January 1, 2009; 55(1): 12 - 14. [Full Text] [PDF]