Clinical Chemistry Siemens Point of Care - Urinalysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 54: e1-10e, 2008. First published July 7, 2008; 10.1373/clinchem.2007.094144
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2007.094144v1
54/8/e1    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sturgeon, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Diamandis, E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sturgeon, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Diamandis, E. P.
(Clinical Chemistry. 2008;54:e1-e10.)
© 2008 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Special Report

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Clinical Practice: Quality Requirements1

Catharine M. Sturgeon1,a, Barry R. Hoffman2, Daniel W. Chan3, Soo-Ling Ch'ng4, Elizabeth Hammond5, Daniel F. Hayes6, Lance A. Liotta7, Emmanuel F. Petricoin7, Manfred Schmitt8, O. John Semmes9, Györg Söletormos10, Elena van der Merwe2 and Eleftherios P. Diamandis2

1 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK;2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada;3 Department of Pathology, Center for Biomarker Discovery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA;4 Tanjung Bungah, Penang, Malaysia (previously Nuclear Medicine Section, Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria);5 Department of Pathology, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA;6 Breast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA;7 Center for Applied Proteomics and Molecular Medicine, College of Sciences, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA;8 Clinical Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany;9 Department of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Center for Biomedical Proteomics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA;10 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hillerød Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK. Fax 44-131-242 6882; e-mail c.sturgeon{at}ed.ac.uk.

Background: This report presents updated National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines summarizing quality requirements for the use of tumor markers.

Methods: One subcommittee developed guidelines for analytical quality relevant to serum and tissue-based tumor markers in current clinical practice. Two other subcommittees formulated recommendations particularly relevant to the developing technologies of microarrays and mass spectrometry.

Results: Prerequisites for optimal use of tumor markers in routine practice include formulation of the correct clinical questions to ensure selection of the appropriate test, adherence to good clinical and laboratory practices (e.g., minimization of the risk of incorrect patient and/or specimen identification, tube type, or timing), use of internationally standardized and well-characterized methods, careful adherence to manufacturer instructions, and proactive and timely reactions to information derived from both internal QC and proficiency-testing specimens. Highly desirable procedures include those designed to minimize the risk of the reporting of erroneous results attributable to interferences such as heterophilic antibodies or hook effects, to facilitate the provision of informative clinical reports (e.g., cumulative and/or graphical reports, appropriately derived reference intervals, and interpretative comments), and when possible to integrate these reports with other patient information through electronic health records. Also mandatory is extensive validation encompassing all stages of analysis before introduction of new technologies such as microarrays and mass spectrometry. Provision of high-quality tumor marker services is facilitated by dialogue involving researchers, diagnostic companies, clinical and laboratory users, and regulatory agencies.

Conclusions: Implementation of these recommendations, adapted to local practice, should encourage optimization of the clinical use of tumor markers.




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. M. Sturgeon, M. J. Duffy, U.-H. Stenman, H. Lilja, N. Brunner, D. W. Chan, R. Babaian, R. C. Bast Jr., B. Dowell, F. J. Esteva, et al.
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2008; 54(12): e11 - e79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. P. Diamandis, B. R. Hoffman, and C. M. Sturgeon
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for the Use of Tumor Markers
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2008; 54(11): 1935 - 1939.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.