Clinical Chemistry Siemens Point of Care - Urinalysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 55: 93-100, 2009. First published November 21, 2008; 10.1373/clinchem.2008.102905
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2008.102905v1
55/1/93    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Apple, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Murakami, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Apple, F. S.
Right arrow Articles by Murakami, M. M.
(Clinical Chemistry. 2009;55:93-100.)
© 2009 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Proteomics and Protein Markers

Assessment of the Multiple-Biomarker Approach for Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction in Patients Presenting with Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Fred S. Apple1,a, Stephen W. Smith2, Lesly A. Pearce3 and MaryAnn M. Murakami1

1 Departments of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology and 2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN; 3 Biostatistical Consulting, Minot, ND.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Hennepin County Medical Center, Clinical Labs P4, 701 Park Ave., Minneapolis, MN 55415. Fax 612-904-4229; e-mail apple004{at}umn.edu.

Background: Cardiac troponin is the preferred biomarker for detecting acute myocardial injury and infarction (MI). We studied whether multiple biomarkers of numerous pathophysiological pathways would increase the diagnostic accuracy for detecting MI.

Methods: Seven biomarkers [myeloperoxidase, soluble CD40 ligand, placental growth factor, matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), cardiac troponin I (cTnI), N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide] and estimated glomerular filtration rate were measured in 457 patients presenting on admission with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome. Twenty-five patients (5.4%) received MI diagnoses. Clinical sensitivities and specificities were evaluated from 99th-percentile reference values. Forward and backward stepwise logistic regression modeling techniques were used to identify biomarkers that were independently predictive of MI.

Results: Biomarker sensitivities ranged from 20% to 96%, and specificities ranged from 19% to 89%. MMP-9 had the highest sensitivity, but its specificity was 19%. cTnI demonstrated a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI, 51%–88%) and a specificity of 89% (95% CI, 85%–92%). In multivariate models, cTnI (P < 0.001) and either hsCRP (P = 0.009) or MMP-9 (P = 0.03) were independently predictive of MI. Addition of hsCRP or MMP-9 increased the specificity to 95% (95% CI, 92%–97%) or 91% (95% CI, 88%–94%), respectively, but reduced the sensitivity to 56% (95% CI, 35%–76%) and 68% (95% CI, 47%–85%) relative to cTnI alone.

Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the most clinically accurate biomarker for the early diagnosis of MI is the use of cTnI alone, rather than a multiple-biomarker approach, when an analytically robust cardiac troponin assay based on the 99th percentile is used.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.