|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics |
1 Respiratory Genetics Group, Human Genetics, 2 Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, and 3 Public Health Sciences and Medical Statistics, Community Clinical Sciences Divisions, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; 4 Department of Community-Based Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; 5 The National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Respiratory Genetics Group, Human Genetics Division, University of Southampton, Duthie Bldg. (MP 808), Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Rd., Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. Fax +02380-794264; e-mail mjrz{at}soton.ac.uk.
Background: Structural variation in the human genome is increasingly recognized as being highly prevalent and having relevance to common human diseases. Array-based comparative genome-hybridization technology can be used to determine copy-number variation (CNV) across entire genomes, and quantitative PCR (qPCR) can be used to validate de novo variation or assays of common CNV in disease-association studies. Analysis of large qPCR data sets can be complicated and time-consuming, however.
Methods: We describe qPCR assays for GSTM1 (glutathione S-transferase mu 1) and GSTT1 (glutathione S-transferase theta 1) gene deletions that can genotype up to 192 samples in duplicate 5-µL reaction volumes in <2 h on the ABI Prism 7900HT Sequence Detection System. To streamline data handling and analysis of these CNVs by qPCR, we developed a novel interactive, macro-driven Microsoft Excel® spreadsheet. As proof of principle, we used our software to analyze CNV data for 1478 DNA samples from a family-based cohort.
Results: With only 8 ng of DNA template, we assigned CNV genotypes (i.e., 2, 1, or 0 copies) to either 96% (GSTM1) or 91% (GSTT1) of all DNA samples in a single round of PCR amplification. Genotyping accuracy, as ascertained by familial inheritance, was >99.5%, and independent genotype assignments with replicate real-time PCR runs were 100% concordant.
Conclusions: The genotyping assay for GSTM1 and GSTT1 gene deletion is suitable for large genetic epidemiologic studies and is a highly effective analysis system that is readily adaptable to analysis of other CNVs. .
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
C. Minelli, R. Granell, R. Newson, M. J Rose-Zerilli, M. Torrent, S. M Ring, J. W Holloway, S. O Shaheen, and J. A Henderson Glutathione-S-transferase genes and asthma phenotypes: a Human Genome Epidemiology (HuGE) systematic review and meta-analysis including unpublished data Int. J. Epidemiol., January 4, 2010; (2010) dyp337v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |