Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 8: 56-61, 1962;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rice, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Loftis, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rice, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Loftis, J. W.

Clinical Chemistry, Vol 8, 56-61, Copyright © 1962 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry

Critique of the Determination of Proteins in Cerebrospinal Fluid

Evaluation of the Biuret Method of Goa and the TCA-turbidimetric Method of Meulemans

Eugene W. Rice 1 and John W. Loftis 1

1 Clinical Laboratory, Presbyterian and Woman's Hospitals, and the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pa.

Cerebrospinal fluid protein values obtained by the biuret procedure of Goa or the TCA-turbidimetric method of Meulemans are shown to be comparable to those obtained by the more involved tyrosine-equivalence "reference" method of Johnston and Gibson. Both of the former methods are recommended for routine use because of their accuracy and simplicity.

Submitted on March 1, 1961






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.