Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 0: clinchem.2009.124743v1, 2009; 10.1373/clinchem.2009.124743
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2009.124743v1
55/9/1701    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caliendo, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schönbrunner, E. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caliendo, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schönbrunner, E. R.

Received on February 6, 2009
Accepted on June 12, 2009

Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics

A Commutable Cytomegalovirus Calibrator Is Required to Improve the Agreement of Viral Load Values Between Laboratories

Angela M. Caliendo 1*, Mona D. Shahbazian 2, Carl Schaper , Jessica Ingersoll 1, Deborah Abdul-Ali 1, Jerry Boonyaratanakornkit 2, Xiao-Li Pang 3, Julie Fox 3, Jutta Preiksaitis 3, E. Ralf Schönbrunner 2

1 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, and Emory Center for AIDS Research, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
2 AcroMetrix Corporation, Benicia, CA
3 Provincial Laboratory for Public Health, Alberta, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: acalien{at}emory.edu.

BACKGROUND: Viral load testing for cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important diagnostic tool for the management of transplant recipients and immunocompromised individuals; however, inconsistency among laboratories in quantitative measurements of viral load limits interinstitutional comparisons. These inconsistencies stem from the lack of assays cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration, the absence of international standards, the wide variety of CMV-extraction and -detection methods, and differences in materials used for calibration. A critical component of standardization is the use of calibrators that are traceable and commutable.

METHODS: Bland–Altman plots and prediction ellipses were used to test the commutability of 2 CMV calibrators for 2 different quantification methods.

RESULTS: Tests with 2 methods showed 1 calibrator to be commutable and the other to be noncommutable. The results for the commutable calibrator were within the 95% prediction interval of the clinical samples in the Bland–Altman plot and within the 95% prediction ellipse for a simulated commutable calibrator, whereas the results for the noncommutable calibrator were not within these prediction intervals. When used to calibrate patient results, only the commutable calibrator, the OptiQuant® CMVtc Calibration Panel, significantly improved the comparability of viral loads for the 2 different measurement methods.

CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that an important goal in the effort to improve healthcare for patients with CMV-related disease is the establishment of traceable and commutable reference materials, including both calibrators and controls.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.