Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 44: 1149-1153, 1998;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rej, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rej, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow History
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 1998;44:1149-1153.)
© 1998 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


AACC 50th Anniversary Retrospective

They Use Enzymes for Everything!

Robert Rej

Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health, and, State University of New York at Albany, School of Public Health, Albany, NY 12201-0509, E-mail rej@wadsworth.org

This year marks the 50th anniversary of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry. In tribute to this semicentenary, this journal will reflect on its published achievements over the past five decades.1 Our Editor has recently enumerated some of the publications that have had an impact on the field, as demonstrated by a solid history of citation (1). This editorial, the first in a projected series of four to appear this year, will reflect on those papers that have advanced the area of enzymes and protein markers–now a regular feature in these pages.

Of the papers that have achieved citation fame (1), approximately 20% deal with clinical enzymology (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Yet another 20% focus on the use of enzymes as analytical tools, e.g., those listed in references 8–10. In the first volume of this journal (1954), enzyme measurements as markers of human disease were the focal points of only two papers. The topics were amylase and arginase. None characterized the use of enzymes as analytical reagents, reflecting clinical laboratory practice of the day. Today, in most laboratories, of the two dozen "routine" chemistry analytes, nearly two-thirds are often determined by enzymatic analyses. This is largely the result of the explosion in the number of studies of enzymes as catalysts, markers of disease, and tools for the laboratorian over the 1960s and the subsequent two decades.

This growth phase in enzymology was concurrent with the growth of the practice of clinical chemistry and of the AACC. Without these advances, modern clinical laboratory analyses would not be possible. The detection of proteins in serum by their catalytic activity as a reporter of tissue damage is a cornerstone of medical laboratory analyses. The uses of a wide variety . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Footnotes


References




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. Rej
Clinical Chemistry through Clinical Chemistry: A Journal Timeline
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2004; 50(12): 2415 - 2458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.