Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 45: 449-450, 1999;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Leary, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Leary, T. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 1999;45:449-450.)
© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Editorials

Reducing the Impact of Endogenous Ribonucleases on Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay Systems

Timothy J. O'Leary

Department of Cellular Pathology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Washington, DC 20306-6000, Fax 202-782-7623, E-mail oleary@afip.osd.mil

Rapid degradation of RNA is the most important factor impeding the analysis of gene expression in human cells and tissues. Once a tissue has been removed from its normal environment, the relative rates of RNA synthesis and degradation change. This in turn gives rise to changes in the relative proportions of various RNA species within a tissue, as well as to an overall reduction of RNA concentrations.

Several approaches have been used to reduce the rate at which RNA concentrations decline after tissue collection. Contamination of samples with exogenous ribonucleases (RNases), particularly those used in the laboratory during RNase treatment of DNA isolates, is universally recognized as an important cause of RNA loss. The use of meticulous laboratory technique to reduce this contamination is absolutely essential to preserve RNA substrates, but is not sufficient to permit analysis of all RNA targets. Isolation of RNA, along with the use of RNase inhibitors, such as diethyl pyrocarbonate, or chaotropic agents, such as guanidinium chloride or guanidinium isothiocyanate, often used in combination, is also helpful, but also is laborious and time-consuming. Rapid fixation of tissue samples with neutral-buffered formalin or precipitating agents, such as ethanol, destroys RNase activity, but increases the complexity of RNA isolation and may inhibit polymerase . . . [Full Text of this Article]


References






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.