Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 46: 793-794, 2000;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, B. E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, B. E. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism
(Clinical Chemistry. 2000;46:793-794.)
© 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Editorial

How Much "UFC" Is Really Cortisol?

Beverley E. Pearson Murphy

Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar, Room C6260, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada

When urinary free cortisol (UFC) determinations became readily available for clinical use in 1968 (1), chromatographic methods were cumbersome. The first competitive protein-binding method (radiotransinassay) (1) used human corticosteroid-binding globulin (transcortin) as the binding protein. The specificity of the assay was enhanced by the use of Fuller’s earth as the agent to adsorb the unbound fraction because it takes up some of the competing steroids differentially (2). The reference interval was ~10–100 µg/day (30–300 nmol/day).

When radioimmunoassays, based on the same competitive binding principle but using antibodies raised to cortisol linked to albumin, became popular during the 1970s, it was assumed that these would be more specific for cortisol, but this assumption was not warranted. As pointed out recently (3), most of the articles published over the past 20 years have quoted even higher values, reflecting a significant lack of specificity.

In 1976, Chattoraj et al. (4) found values for UFC after combined thin-layer and column chromatography that were approximately one-half those of the original method (. . . [Full Text of this Article]


References




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
 Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
J A Jackson, M P Wailoo, J R Thompson, and S A Petersen
Early physiological development of infants with intrauterine growth retardation
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., January 1, 2004; 89(1): F46 - F50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. S. Fink, L. N. Pierre, P. T. Daley-Yates, D. H. Richards, A. Gibson, and J. W. Honour
Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Function after Inhaled Corticosteroids: Unreliability of Urinary Free Cortisol Estimation
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2002; 87(10): 4541 - 4546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Chem.Home page
R. L. Taylor, D. Machacek, and R. J. Singh
Validation of a High-Throughput Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for Urinary Cortisol and Cortisone
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2002; 48(9): 1511 - 1519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
B. J. Lipworth, R. A. Nathan, and R. ZuWallack
Fluticasone and Cortisol Measurements
Chest, March 1, 2001; 119(3): 984 - 985.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.