HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Voortman, A. Articles by Verhoef, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Voortman, A. Articles by Verhoef, P. Related Collections General Clinical Chemistry Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Optimal Time Interval between Repeated Blood Sampling for Measurements of Total Homocysteine in Healthy Individuals

¹ Division of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology, Wageningen University, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands

² Wageningen Centre for Food Sciences, 6703 GW Wageningen, The Netherlands

^aaddress correspondence to this author at: Wageningen Centre for Food Sciences/Division of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology, Wageningen University, PO Box 8129, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands; fax 31-317-485369, e-mail Petra.Verhoef@Staff.NutEpi.WAU.nl

Many studies have shown that increased plasma concentrations of total homocysteine (tHcy) are associated with cardiovascular disease (1). Like most biological variables, plasma tHcy fluctuates within an individual around a long-term mean (2)(3). tHcy measurements often are based on a single blood sample. Taking the mean of two or more repeated measurements will reduce the error attributable to within-subject biological fluctuations and reflect more closely a person’s true mean tHcy value within a certain period. However, as the time interval between two repeated measurements becomes shorter, the values become more similar and the error reduction diminishes. In that case, the benefit of taking the mean of two measurements is not fully used. On the other hand, intervals that are too long (several weeks) may compromise the compliance of study participants and allow long-term seasonal changes (4)(5).

Several studies on the weekly and monthly biological variation, as expressed by the CV, in plasma tHcy concentrations have been published (Table 1 ). From these studies, no conclusions can be drawn about the optimal time interval between two repeated samples to obtain a sufficiently precise estimate of the true tHcy concentration within a predefined period. The optimal time interval is reached when the interval-specific CV does not increase further with increasing time intervals.

The aim of this study was to determine how many days between two samplings within 1 week are needed to reach the maximum biological variation in tHcy. Our findings may be useful in studies involving estimates of an individual’s true mean concentration of tHcy.

The participants in this study were six male and nine female healthy volunteers, ages 19–46 years. Use of medication or . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Appendix 1

Acknowledgments

References

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				G. Soletormos, A. Semjonow, P. E.C. Sibley, R. Lamerz, P. H. Petersen, W. Albrecht, P. Bialk, M. Gion, F. Junker, H.-P. Schmid, et al. Biological Variation of Total Prostate-Specific Antigen: A Survey of Published Estimates and Consequences for Clinical Practice Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1342 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P Hannon-Fletcher, N. C Armstrong, J. M Scott, K. Pentieva, I. Bradbury, M. Ward, J. Strain, A. A Dunn, A. M Molloy, M. A Kerr, et al. Determining bioavailability of food folates in a controlled intervention study Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2004; 80(4): 911 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Melse-Boonstra, C. E West, M. B Katan, F. J Kok, and P. Verhoef Bioavailability of heptaglutamyl relative to monoglutamyl folic acid in healthy adults Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2004; 79(3): 424 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]