|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1
Hospital Universitari "Germans Trias i Pujol", 08916 Barcelona, Spain;
2
Hospital "Vall dHebron", 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
3
Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, Denmark
aaddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Biochemistry, Hospital "Germans Trias i Pujol", Ctra. de Canyet s/n, 08916 Barcelona, Spain. Fax 34-34-978-843, e-mail cbiosca@ns.hugtip.scs.es
| Introduction |
|---|
In previous work using data from kidney transplantation patients (6)(8), we noted that the analytes most suitable for detecting significant changes during posttransplantation follow-up are serum creatinine, urate, and urea. We hypothesized that the predictive power of these analytes might greatly increase if more than one showed simultaneous and independent changes before the clinical manifestations of reduced kidney function became apparent.
We developed an objective analytical indicator (using these analytes) to detect potential subclinical crises in renal transplant recipients based on the RCV concept. To make the model relevant for use in daily practice, we attempted to include nephrologists criteria in the final values proposed by determining the factors they consider crucial when monitoring their transplant patients (9)(10). The underlying goal of this effort was to extract the most information possible from routine laboratory data and offer the clinician an improved tool for patient care.
To test whether the concentrations of creatinine, urea, and urate were independent, pairs of data from the three
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
F. Omar, G. F van der Watt, and T. S Pillay Reference change values: how useful are they? J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2008; 61(4): 426 - 427. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |