|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of Nuclear Medicine University, 44100 Ferrara, Italy;
2
Hypertension and Clinical Physiology Center, Institute of Clinical Medicine University, 20100 Milan, Italy;
3
Endocrinology Section University, 60100 Ancona, Italy;
4
Central Laboratory RIA Section, S. Camillo Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy;
5
Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Center of Research, 56100 Pisa, Italy
aaddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Section of Nuclear Medicine, Via Luigi Borsari, 46, 44100 Ferrara, Italy; fax 39-0532-236589, e-mail pif@unife.it
| Introduction |
|---|
A pilot study (11)(12) in a limited number of laboratories (eight Italian centers) found satisfactory indexes of precision for a direct immunoradiometric renin assay (Eria Diagnostics, Sanofi-Pasteur). In our previous experience, the inter- and intralaboratory reproducibility indices of this commercial immunoradiometric assay appeared to be better than those that had been achieved with an enzymatic assay (REN-CTK; Sorin Biomedica), with the differences probably being attributable to the greater complexity of the procedure for the latter assay (11).
Various reports have been published during the past 30 years describing useful
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
D. J. Campbell, J. Nussberger, M. Stowasser, A.H. J. Danser, A. Morganti, E. Frandsen, and J. Menard Activity Assays and Immunoassays for Plasma Renin and Prorenin: Information Provided and Precautions Necessary for Accurate Measurement Clin. Chem., May 1, 2009; 55(5): 867 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |