Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 47: 1482-1485, 2001;
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stowe, H.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stowe, H.
Right arrow Articles by Lamb, E. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2001;47:1482-1485.)
© 2001 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Analytical Performance of a Particle-enhanced Nephelometric Immunoassay for Serum Cystatin C Using Rate Analysis

Helen Stowe1, David Lawrence1, David J. Newman2 and Edmund J. Lamb1a

1 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust, Kent and Canterbury Hospital, Ethelbert Road, Canterbury CT1 3NG, Kent, United Kingdom

2 The South West Thames Institute for Renal Research, St. Helier’s Hospital, Carshalton SM5 1AA, Surrey, United Kingdom

aauthor for correspondence: fax 44-1227-783077, e-mail edmund.lamb@kch-tr.sthames.nhs.uk

The serum cystatin C concentration reflects glomerular filtration and, as a marker of renal disease, demonstrates improved accuracy and sensitivity compared with serum creatinine (1)(2)(3). Several assays (4) have been described for cystatin C, including latex particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassays (PENIAs) (5) and turbidimetric immunoassays (PETIAs) (2)(3). The PETIA marketed by Dako Ltd (cat. no. K 0071; Ely, United Kingdom) has been adapted to a variety of automated analyzers that use fixed-interval turbidimetric measurement (6)(7). However, the analytical performance initially described for this method (2) has not always been replicated. Compared with the PENIA developed for the Dade Behring (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom) nephelometers [e.g., the Behring Nephelometer II (BNII)], the PETIA demonstrates high imprecision at the upper limit of the reference interval (6)(8)(9) and susceptibility to spectral interferences (4). On a Cobas Mira S Plus analyzer, these reagents were subject to interference from bilirubin (>270 µmol/L), hemoglobin (>4 g/L), and triglycerides (>5.7 mmol/L), and between-day imprecision (CV) exceeded 8% at 1.10 and 4.10 mg/L (10).

We describe the measurement of cystatin C using an adaptation of these reagents in a nephelometric immunoassay using kinetic rate analysis. All analyses were performed with a single batch of reagent on an automated rate nephelometer (ImmageTM analyzer; Beckman-Coulter Ltd., High Wycombe, United Kingdom). Recombinant human cystatin C calibrators supplied by the manufacturer were used, and an additional calibrator was prepared by diluting (1:1) the calibrator with the lowest cystatin C concentration (0.39 mg/L) in phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 (cat. no. 447640; Beckman-Coulter Ltd.). The calibrator with the highest concentration (12.3 mg/L) was not used. Analyses were performed in user-defined mode, using provisional settings provided . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Acknowledgments


References




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. J. Lamb, H. J. Stowe, D. E. Simpson, A. J. Coakley, D. J. Newman, and M. Leahy
Diagnostic Accuracy of Cystatin C as a Marker of Kidney Disease in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate Formulas Are Equally Useful
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2004; 50(10): 1848 - 1851.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.