Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 49: 19-20, 2003; 10.1373/49.1.19
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruns, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruns, D. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
(Clinical Chemistry. 2003;49:19-20.)
© 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Editorials

The STARD Initiative and the Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy

David E. Bruns1a

1 Department of Pathology, Box 800214, University of Virginia Medical School

aE-mail dbruns@virginia.edu

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

With the current public attention on medical tests (1), it is appropriate that we publish (2) this month, simultaneously with other journals,1 the first result of an international project to improve the reporting of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of medical tests. The report(2) on Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) reflects a multidisciplinary effort, 3 years in the making, that involved close collaboration of scores of clinicians, clinical investigators, clinical chemists, radiologists, clinical microbiologists, methodologists, and others. I review here some of the evidence that studies of diagnostic accuracy of medical tests need improving and I suggest that the STARD report(2) is a step in the right direction.


What Is Diagnostic Accuracy?

"Diagnostic accuracy" refers to the ability of a test to identify a condition of interest. In studies of diagnostic accuracy, the results of one or more tests are compared with a reference ("gold") standard in a group of patients suspected of having the condition of interest. The term "accuracy" in this context thus refers to the amount of agreement between the studied test(s) and the reference standard.

Studies of diagnostic accuracy are distinct from studies of analytical characteristics of a test, such as analytical accuracy, and distinct from studies of nonanalytical factors, such as within-person biological variation. Both of these types of studies provide essential information about tests, but they are not the focus here. Similarly, studies of diagnostic accuracy must be distinguished from studies of outcomes related to testing (such as improvements in health) and from studies of cost-effectiveness of testing. Quantitative understanding of the diagnostic accuracy of a test is critical both in deciding on its potential to improve outcomes and in assessing the results of a test in an individual patient.

The term diagnostic accuracy is sometimes used in a . . . [Full Text of this Article]


The Need for Improvement


Efforts to Improve Reporting of Studies in Clinical Chemistry


The STARD Initiative




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
A. Viljoen and P. J Twomey
True or not: uncertainty of laboratory results
J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2007; 60(6): 587 - 588.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi.Home page
N. Boutros, L. Fraenkel, and A. Feingold
A Four-Step Approach for Developing Diagnostic Tests in Psychiatry: EEG in ADHD as a Test Case
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, November 1, 2005; 17(4): 455 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. M.M. Bossuyt
The Quality of Reporting in Diagnostic Test Research: Getting Better, Still Not Optimal
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 465 - 466.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
B. Lumbreras-Lacarra, J. M. Ramos-Rincon, and I. Hernandez-Aguado
Methodology in Diagnostic Laboratory Test Research in Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 530 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. A. Herold and R. L. Fitzgerald
Immunoassays for Testosterone in Women: Better than a Guess?
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2003; 49(8): 1250 - 1251.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.