Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 49: 1672-1675, 2003; 10.1373/49.10.1672
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanck, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dearth, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blanck, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dearth, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2003;49:1672-1675.)
© 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Serum Iron and Iron-binding Capacity: A Round-Robin Interlaboratory Comparison Study

Heidi Michels Blanck1,a, Christine M. Pfeiffer2, Samuel P. Caudill2, Michele Reyes1, Elaine W. Gunter2, Giuseppina Imperatore3, Onno W. van Assendelft4, Sonya Strider2 and Tracy Dearth2

1 Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

2 Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health

3 Division of Diabetes Translation, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, and
4 Scientific Resources Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC, Atlanta, GA 30341

aaddress correspondence to this author at: 770 Buford Hwy NE, MS K-26, Atlanta, GA 30341; fax 770-488-6027, e-mail Hblanck@cdc.gov

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

A panel convened by the CDC recommended that transferrin saturation be used as the initial test for hemochromatosis (1). Transferrin saturation can be calculated from the ratio of serum iron concentration to total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) expressed as a percentage [(serum iron/TIBC) x 100] or, instead, using the sum of serum iron and unsaturated iron-binding capacity (UIBC): TIBCcalc = serum iron + UIBC. We conducted a round-robin interlaboratory comparison study to assess the comparability of results for serum iron and iron-binding capacity assays.

To solicit participants, we sent invitations to iron experts (n = 10) and an announcement was placed on the Clinical Chemistry/General Topics listserv and in the American Association for Clinical Chemistry Nutrition Division newsletter; separate announcements were sent to at least 25 providers of US diagnostic services. A CDC Institutional Review Board approved the protocol (no. 2552). A contracted blood donor center collected 1 unit of blood from each anonymous human donor who gave informed consent. The donor center was also instructed to invite hemochromatosis patients to participate to ensure samples with increased iron status but free of iron supplement use. Serum was made by collecting the blood in bags with no anticoagulant. The blood was allowed to clot for several hours and centrifuged, and the serum was decanted. No manipulation (i.e., addition of analyte) of serum samples was done. Each serum sample was tested for serum iron and TIBC in the Nutrition Laboratory at CDC, using the Alpkem Flow IV colorimetric methods (2)(3). The methods are semiautomated applications of the NCCLS-recommended manual methods (4). On the basis of the transferrin saturation values, we combined four samples to create a pool representing marginal iron status (low pool), three to create a pool that was borderline increased and therefore close . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.