HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (31) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Herold, D. A. Articles by Fitzgerald, R. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Herold, D. A. Articles by Fitzgerald, R. L. Related Collections Pediatric Clinical Chemistry Endocrinology and Metabolism

Immunoassays for Testosterone in Women: Better than a Guess?

¹ VA San Diego Healthcare System, and, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA 92161

^aAuthor for correspondence. E-mail dherold@ucsd.edu.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Recent developments in the field of mass spectrometry have provided the accuracy and sensitivity to evaluate very-low-abundance steroids such as testosterone in female and pediatric patients. In this issue of Clinical Chemistry, Taieb et al. (1) present the most comprehensive evaluation of automated testosterone immunoassays to date. They compared 10 commercially available immunoassays with isotope-dilution gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (ID-GC/MS) and reached the inescapable conclusion that testosterone immunoassay results for specimens from females are inaccurate. Similar data have been reported for individual testosterone immunoassays previously (2), but Taieb et al. (1) are the first to show that for every commercially available testosterone assay studied, the values are in error—by a factor of 2 on average and in some cases by a factor of almost 5. Are assays that miss target values by 200–500% meaningful? Guessing would be more accurate and additionally could provide cheaper and faster testosterone results for females—without even having to draw the patient’s blood.

By limiting all guesses to a narrow range, e.g., 2.04–2.44 nmol/L, the results would rarely be off by more than a factor of 3. Using a random number generator, we generated values close to the average female concentration measured by Taieb et al. (they were kind enough . . . [Full Text of this Article]

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				L. M. Thienpont, K. Van Uytfanghe, S. Blincko, C. S. Ramsay, H. Xie, R. C. Doss, B. G. Keevil, L. J. Owen, A. L. Rockwood, M. M. Kushnir, et al. State-of-the-Art of Serum Testosterone Measurement by Isotope Dilution-Liquid Chromatography- Tandem Mass Spectrometry Clin. Chem., August 1, 2008; 54(8): 1290 - 1297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Z. Stanczyk, J. S. Lee, and R. J. Santen Standardization of Steroid Hormone Assays: Why, How, and When? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1713 - 1719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Nielsen, C. Hagen, K. Wraae, K. Brixen, P. H. Petersen, E. Haug, R. Larsen, and M. Andersen Visceral and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Relation to Circulating Androgens, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, and Luteinizing Hormone in Young Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 2696 - 2705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Handelsman The Rationale for Banning Human Chorionic Gonadotropin and Estrogen Blockers in Sport J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2006; 91(5): 1646 - 1653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Kushnir, A. L. Rockwood, W. L. Roberts, E. G. Pattison, A. M. Bunker, R. L. Fitzgerald, and A. W. Meikle Performance Characteristics of a Novel Tandem Mass Spectrometry Assay For Serum Testosterone Clin. Chem., January 1, 2006; 52(1): 120 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Sikaris, R. I. McLachlan, R. Kazlauskas, D. de Kretser, C. A. Holden, and D. J. Handelsman Reproductive Hormone Reference Intervals for Healthy Fertile Young Men: Evaluation of Automated Platform Assays J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 5928 - 5936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Cawood, H. P. Field, C. G. Ford, S. Gillingwater, A. Kicman, D. Cowan, and J. H. Barth Testosterone Measurement by Isotope-Dilution Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry: Validation of a Method for Routine Clinical Practice Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1472 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. P Ly and D. J Handelsman Empirical estimation of free testosterone from testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin immunoassays Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2005; 152(3): 471 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Bassindale, D. A. Cowan, S. Dale, A. J. Hutt, A. R. Leeds, M. J. Wheeler, and A. T. Kicman Effects of Oral Administration of Androstenedione on Plasma Androgens in Young Women Using Hormonal Contraception J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 6030 - 6038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C Tomlinson, H Macintyre, C A Dorrian, S F Ahmed, and A M Wallace Testosterone measurements in early infancy Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., November 1, 2004; 89(6): F558 - F559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Z. Stanczyk Reliability of Extraction/Chromatography RIAs Clin. Chem., April 1, 2004; 50(4): 778 - 778. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Herold and R. L. Fitzgerald Reliability of Extraction/Chromatography RIAs: Response Clin. Chem., April 1, 2004; 50(4): 778 - 778. [Full Text] [PDF]