Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Clinical Chemistry 50: 764-766, 2004; 10.1373/clinchem.2003.029553
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dighe, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sluss, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dighe, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sluss, P. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism
(Clinical Chemistry. 2004;50:764-766.)
© 2004 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Technical Briefs

Improved Detection of Serum Estradiol after Sample Extraction Procedure

Anand S. Dighe1 and Patrick M. Sluss1,a

1 Reproductive Endocrine Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston MA 02114

aauthor for correspondence: fax 617-726-9330, e-mail psluss@partners.org

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The direct measurement of serum estradiol offers advantages over the more traditional sample extraction and immunoassay methods with respect to technical ease of the assay and turnaround time. However, direct assays have not been demonstrated sufficiently sensitive for some important clinical applications, including the measurement of circulating estradiol in women during the early follicular phase of their menstrual cycle, in postmenopausal women, and in men. We report here a rapid sample extraction method developed to improve the detection limit of automated estradiol assays and thus enhance the potential usefulness of these rapid and nonisotopic systems for measuring low concentrations of serum estradiol.

Serum estradiol concentrations have long been used in conjunction with ultrasonography and other clinical indices to monitor ovarian stimulation by exogenous gonadotropin therapy during in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures (1)(2)(3). With the recent use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, serum estradiol measurement has also been used to assess the adequacy of ovarian suppression before exogenous gonadotropin stimulation. In addition, it has become increasingly important to measure the low initial concentrations of serum estradiol (<150 ng/L) associated with the earlier stages of ovarian follicular stimulation (4)(5). Clinically important measurements of low estradiol concentrations are also required in assessing ovarian activity in perimenopausal women or women experiencing premature ovarian failure and in clinical investigations of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in men (6)(7)(8).

Methods for the direct measurement of serum estradiol are replacing the more traditional RIA methods that use preassay sample extraction followed by RIA with antecedent column chromatography. Direct methods are advantageous because they are rapid and less technically demanding. However, direct assays are often inaccurate, particularly for the measurement of relatively low concentrations of serum estradiol (9)(10)(11). The . . . [Full Text of this Article]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.