HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data supplement Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Preissner, C. M. Articles by Grebe, S. K.G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Preissner, C. M. Articles by Grebe, S. K.G. Related Collections Endocrinology and Metabolism

Plastic versus Glass Tubes: Effects on Analytical Performance of Selected Serum and Plasma Hormone Assays

¹ Endocrine Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

^aaddress correspondence to this author at: Endocrine Laboratory, Hilton 730C, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St, SW, Rochester, MN 55905; fax 507-284-9758, e-mail grebs@mayo.edu

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

During the last decade, plastic blood collection tubes have been progressively replacing glass tubes. Plastic tubes are not only less expensive but also safer than glass tubes, because they are less likely to break. Unfortunately, it is frequently difficult or impossible for individual laboratories to obtain comprehensive data on the equivalence of replacement plastic tubes vs their original glass counterparts. This is a particularly important issue for many endocrine assays, especially peptide hormones. These often degrade rapidly and can adsorb to a variety of surfaces (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). Changing from glass to plastic tubes can also be problematic for analytes that are regarded as stable. An example of the latter can be seen in therapeutic drug monitoring, where plastic tubes have been shown to influence the measured concentrations or stabilities of several drugs (8)(9)(10). Similar concerns may apply to low-molecular-weight hormones, such as steroid hormones and biogenic amines. These are increasingly assayed by HPLC, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. It is conceivable that low-molecular-weight organic substances released by plastic tubes could interfere in some of these assays (11) and that small changes that are not detected by immunoassays would change the results of more specific methods. Finally, in certain situations, such as serial monitoring of tumor markers, even minor discrepancies between glass and plastic tubes may gain significance during changeover from one type of collection to the other.

We designed the present study to give a reasonable representation of the range of analytes and analytical methodologies used in our laboratory, with particular emphasis on peptide hormones because of their known instability. We selected the following analytes:

• (a) Five peptide hormones—adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), insulin, insulin-like growth factor . . . [Full Text of this Article]

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				S. Wang, V. Ho, A. Roquemore-Goins, and F. A. Smith Effects of Blood Collection Tubes, including Pediatric Devices, on 16 Common Immunoassays. Clin. Chem., May 1, 2006; 52(5): 892 - 893. [Full Text] [PDF]