Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 51: 9-11, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2004.042994
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bjerner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nustad, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bjerner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nustad, K.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Clinical Immunology
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:9-11.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Editorials

The War on Heterophilic Antibody Interference

Johan Bjernera, Ole P. Børmer and Kjell Nustad

Central Laboratory, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello, N-0310 Oslo, Norway

aAuthor for correspondence. Fax 47-22-730725; e-mail johan.bjerner@klinmed.uio.no.

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Human heterophilic antibodies may bind the animal antibodies used in an immunoassay and thus produce erroneous results. Such interference has been increasingly recognized as a diagnostic problem (1)(2). In this issue of Clinical Chemistry, Adel Ismail (3) discusses the two main issues of heterophilic antibody interference in immunometric assays: how to detect it and how to avoid it. This is an important discussion to which all clinical chemists should feel invited. This field requires not only a profound understanding of heterophilic antibody interference but also hands-on experience with immunoassays.

To detect heterophilic antibody interference in the sample, the first critical step is to suspect it. The starting point is often a clinician contacting the laboratory about a mismatch between the clinical information and laboratory results. Once there is suspicion of such interference, a classic approach has been to make serial dilutions of the sample. As Ismail (3) points out, most samples with heterophilic antibody interference will then display nonlinearity. The author does not explain this nonlinearity but draws attention to the polyclonality of interfering antibodies, with affinities ranging from high to low, and he points out that with human antibodies more than one functional binding site is often involved. Human antibodies with high affinities for animal antibodies are specific for one or more animal species and do not bind human immunoglobulins. High-affinity human anti-human immunoglobulins would instantly form larger complexes, either to be removed from circulation or to cause serious disease. In our experience before the surge in therapeutic use of murine or humanized murine monoclonal antibodies, we found little evidence of interfering immunoglobulins from the immunoglobulin classes that normally exhibit higher affinities, i.e., IgA or IgG (personal observation). Low-affinity human antibodies often bind to both animal and human immunoglobulins, making . . . [Full Text of this Article]




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
The OncologistHome page
B. E.P.B. Ballieux, N. I. Weijl, H. Gelderblom, J. van Pelt, and S. Osanto
False-Positive Serum Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) in a Male Patient with a Malignant Germ Cell Tumor of the Testis: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Oncologist, November 1, 2008; 13(11): 1149 - 1154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. L. La'ulu and W. L. Roberts
Second-Trimester Reference Intervals for Thyroid Tests: The Role of Ethnicity
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2007; 53(9): 1658 - 1664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
U.-H. Stenman
Improving Immunoassay Performance by Antibody Engineering
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2005; 51(5): 801 - 802.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. J. Warren, J. Bjerner, E. Paus, O. P. Bormer, and K. Nustad
Use of an In Vivo Biotinylated Single-Chain Antibody as Capture Reagent in an Immunometric Assay to Decrease the Incidence of Interference from Heterophilic Antibodies
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2005; 51(5): 830 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.