HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ishibashi, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ishibashi, M. Related Collections Laboratory Management Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002) Proteomics and Protein Markers

Standardization of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Assays: Can Interchangeability of PSA Measurements Be Improved?

Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

The landscape of prostate cancer has changed since the appearance of the first prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assay. PSA testing has gained rapid recognition since M. Kuriyama et al. (1) of Roswell Park first reported clinical studies using an enzyme immunoassay with anti-PSA rabbit antibody. Mikolajczyk and coworkers (2)(3) reported the presence of several free PSA isoforms and the potential application of free PSA isoforms as serum markers. Today, more than 30 types of total PSA assay reagent sets and 10 types of free PSA and PSA–₁-antichymotrypsin (ACT) assays, based on various principles, are available.

Key elements in PSA measurement are interchangeability of assays and stability of serum samples before tests (4)(5). Efforts to standardize PSA assays were initiated in 1992 at the First Stanford Conference, organized by T. Stamey. At the Second Stanford Conference on International Standardization of Prostate-Specific Antigen (1994), Stamey et al. (6) proposed a primary calibrator consisting of 90% purified PSA-ACT and 10% free PSA (90:10) on a molar basis. Subsequently, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly NCCLS) issued a document (7) recommending a set of 3 distinct materials containing 100% free PSA, 100% PSA-ACT, and 90% PSA-ACT:10% free PSA. This document led to further activity in the harmonization of PSA assays.

In 1999, Robert M. Nakamura, a member of the International Consultation Committee on Prostate Cancer, made recommendations, with his colleagues (8), . . . [Full Text of this Article]

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				K. C. Vickers, C. T. Maguire, R. Wolfert, A. R. Burns, M. Reardon, R. Geis, P. Holvoet, and J. D. Morrisett Relationship of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 and oxidized low density lipoprotein in carotid atherosclerosis J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2009; 50(9): 1735 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A.R. Kort, F. Martens, H. Vanpoucke, H. L. van Duijnhoven, and M. A. Blankenstein Comparison of 6 Automated Assays for Total and Free Prostate-Specific Antigen with Special Reference to Their Reactivity toward the WHO 96/670 Reference Preparation Clin. Chem., August 1, 2006; 52(8): 1568 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]