|
|
||||||||
Point/Counterpoint |
1 Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, MA.
2 Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Lesley A Stevens, Division of Nephrology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St, Box 391, Boston, MA 02111. Fax 617-636-5740; e-mail Lstevens1@Tufts-nemc.org.
| The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| Introduction |
|---|
11%, or
20 million people (4). CKD is associated with poor outcomes and high cost, disproportionately affecting the elderly and racial and ethnic minorities. Thus, new public health campaigns focus on early detection of CKD, especially in patients at increased risk, including those with hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or a family history of CKD (5). To facilitate early detection of CKD, many national and international organizations now recommend automatic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) whenever serum creatinine is measured (1)(2)(3)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Approximately 20% of participants in the College of American Pathologists chemistry survey were reporting eGFR calculations in 2005 (13). In this issue of Clinical Chemistry, Dr. Rainey offers a dissenting view, likening automatic eGFR reporting to "jumping the gun". A careful examination of the arguments reveals, in our view, that reporting eGFR whenever a serum creatinine is requested is "just what the doctor ordered".
| the only reason to measure serum creatinine is to assess gfr |
|---|
The serum creatinine level holds no clinically useful meaning other than to serve as
| gfr estimating equations provide more accurate estimates of gfr than does serum creatinine alone |
|---|
| limitations of gfr estimates primarily reflect limitations of serum creatinine as an endogenous filtration marker |
|---|
| in some circumstances, creatinine clearance measurements can be used as confirmatory tests |
|---|
| early detection and appropriate evaluation and management of ckd can improve outcomes |
|---|
| reporting Egfr simplifies the evaluation and management of ckd |
|---|
| the benefit of reporting Egfr likely outweighs the harm |
|---|
| education vs legislation |
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
B. R. Herts, E. Schneider, E. D. Poggio, N. A. Obuchowski, and M. E. Baker Identifying Outpatients with Renal Insufficiency before Contrast-enhanced CT by Using Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates versus Serum Creatinine Levels Radiology, May 5, 2008; (2008) 2481071528. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |