Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 52: 553-554, 2006; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.063511
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Rej, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Miller, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Rej, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
Right arrow Current Issues in Laboratory Medicine
(Clinical Chemistry. 2006;52:553-554.)
© 2006 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Editorials

Why Commutability Matters

W. Greg Miller1,a, Gary L. Myers2 and Robert Rej3

1 Department of Pathology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, VA
2 Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA
3 Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research New York State Department of Health and School of Public Health State University of New York at Albany Albany, NY

aAddress correspondence to this author at: PO Box 980286, Richmond, VA 23298-0286. Fax 804-828-0375; e-mail gmiller@vcu.edu.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

A fundamental goal of laboratory medicine is that results for patients’ samples will be comparable independent of the medical laboratory that produced the results. Routine measurement procedures of acceptable analytical specificity that have calibration traceable to the same higher-order reference material or reference measurement procedure should produce numerical values for clinical samples that are comparable irrespective of time, place, or laboratory generating the result.

The term "commutability" was first used to describe the ability of a reference or control material to have interassay properties comparable to the properties demonstrated by authentic clinical samples when measured by more than one analytical method (1)(2)(3). More recent metrologic documents expand the concept; they describe commutability as the equivalence of the mathematical relationships between the results of different measurement procedures for a reference material and for representative samples from healthy and diseased individuals (4)(5).

A reference material is typically used to establish or verify the traceability of a measurement procedure to a value assigned to the material that represents the best estimate of the correct, or true, value. Concentration or activity values are assigned to reference materials by higher-order measurement procedures, when possible, or alternatively by a consensus process when reference measurement procedures are not available. When a reference material is intended to be measured by a routine clinical method, commutability must be validated . . . [Full Text of this Article]




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. M. Caliendo, M. D. Shahbazian, C. Schaper, J. Ingersoll, D. Abdul-Ali, J. Boonyaratanakornkit, X.-L. Pang, J. Fox, J. Preiksaitis, and E. R. Schonbrunner
A Commutable Cytomegalovirus Calibrator Is Required to Improve the Agreement of Viral Load Values between Laboratories
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2009; 55(9): 1701 - 1710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. M. Sturgeon, P. Berger, J.-M. Bidart, S. Birken, C. Burns, R. J. Norman, U.-H. Stenman, and on behalf of the IFCC Working Group on hCG
Differences in Recognition of the 1st WHO International Reference Reagents for hCG-Related Isoforms by Diagnostic Immunoassays for Human Chorionic Gonadotropin
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2009; 55(8): 1484 - 1491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
H. W. Vesper and L. M. Thienpont
Traceability in Laboratory Medicine
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2009; 55(6): 1067 - 1075.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
M. Bidlingmaier
Problems with GH assays and strategies toward standardization
Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2008; 159(suppl_1): S41 - S44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. Cattozzo, E. Guerra, F. Ceriotti, C. Franzini, and on behalf of the Enzyme Working Group of the Itali
Commutable Calibrator with Value Assigned by the IFCC Reference Procedure to Harmonize Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity Results Measured by 2 Different Methods
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2008; 54(8): 1349 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
R. Cramb, J. French, M. Mackness, R D. G Neely, M. Caslake, and F. MacKenzie
Lipid external quality assessment: commutability between external quality assessment and clinical specimens
Ann Clin Biochem, May 1, 2008; 45(3): 260 - 265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
H.-M. Wiedmeyer, K. S. Polonsky, G. L. Myers, R. R. Little, C. J. Greenbaum, D. E. Goldstein, and J. P. Palmer
International Comparison of C-Peptide Measurements
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 784 - 787.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
G. Miller, G.L. Myers, J.H. Eckfeldt, and N. Greenberg
Calculating eGFR using the MDRD equation
QJM, February 1, 2007; 100(2): 142 - 143.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.