|
|
||||||||
Editorials |
1 Department of Pathology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, VA
2 Division of Laboratory Sciences National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta, GA
3 Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research New York State Department of Health and School of Public Health State University of New York at Albany Albany, NY
aAddress correspondence to this author at: PO Box 980286, Richmond, VA 23298-0286. Fax 804-828-0375; e-mail gmiller@vcu.edu.
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
A fundamental goal of laboratory medicine is that results for patients samples will be comparable independent of the medical laboratory that produced the results. Routine measurement procedures of acceptable analytical specificity that have calibration traceable to the same higher-order reference material or reference measurement procedure should produce numerical values for clinical samples that are comparable irrespective of time, place, or laboratory generating the result.
The term "commutability" was first used to describe the ability of a reference or control material to have interassay properties comparable to the properties demonstrated by authentic clinical samples when measured by more than one analytical method (1)(2)(3). More recent metrologic documents expand the concept; they describe commutability as the equivalence of the mathematical relationships between the results of different measurement procedures for a reference material and for representative samples from healthy and diseased individuals (4)(5).
A reference material is typically used to establish or verify the traceability of a measurement procedure to a value assigned to the material that represents the best estimate of the correct, or true, value. Concentration or activity values are assigned to reference materials by higher-order measurement procedures, when possible, or alternatively by a consensus process when reference measurement procedures are not available. When a reference material is intended to be measured by a routine clinical method, commutability must be validated
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
A. M. Caliendo, M. D. Shahbazian, C. Schaper, J. Ingersoll, D. Abdul-Ali, J. Boonyaratanakornkit, X.-L. Pang, J. Fox, J. Preiksaitis, and E. R. Schonbrunner A Commutable Cytomegalovirus Calibrator Is Required to Improve the Agreement of Viral Load Values between Laboratories Clin. Chem., September 1, 2009; 55(9): 1701 - 1710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Sturgeon, P. Berger, J.-M. Bidart, S. Birken, C. Burns, R. J. Norman, U.-H. Stenman, and on behalf of the IFCC Working Group on hCG Differences in Recognition of the 1st WHO International Reference Reagents for hCG-Related Isoforms by Diagnostic Immunoassays for Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Clin. Chem., August 1, 2009; 55(8): 1484 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. W. Vesper and L. M. Thienpont Traceability in Laboratory Medicine Clin. Chem., June 1, 2009; 55(6): 1067 - 1075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bidlingmaier Problems with GH assays and strategies toward standardization Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2008; 159(suppl_1): S41 - S44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cattozzo, E. Guerra, F. Ceriotti, C. Franzini, and on behalf of the Enzyme Working Group of the Itali Commutable Calibrator with Value Assigned by the IFCC Reference Procedure to Harmonize Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity Results Measured by 2 Different Methods Clin. Chem., August 1, 2008; 54(8): 1349 - 1355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Cramb, J. French, M. Mackness, R D. G Neely, M. Caslake, and F. MacKenzie Lipid external quality assessment: commutability between external quality assessment and clinical specimens Ann Clin Biochem, May 1, 2008; 45(3): 260 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-M. Wiedmeyer, K. S. Polonsky, G. L. Myers, R. R. Little, C. J. Greenbaum, D. E. Goldstein, and J. P. Palmer International Comparison of C-Peptide Measurements Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 784 - 787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Miller, G.L. Myers, J.H. Eckfeldt, and N. Greenberg Calculating eGFR using the MDRD equation QJM, February 1, 2007; 100(2): 142 - 143. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |