HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alpert, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alpert, J. S.

Will the Real Myocardial Infarction Please Stand Up?

University of Arizona Health Science Center, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85724-5035, E-mail jalpert@email.arizona.edu

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Defining a disease is a process whereby physicians and clinical scientists are able to place a label on a specific pathologic entity. If this label is used carefully, it will characterize that disease process to facilitate future interactions between the patient and the healthcare system. Labeling a patient with a specific diagnosis has important implications for that person with respect to his or her relationship to the rest of society. For example, when a patient is labeled as having suffered a myocardial infarction, that individual’s ability to hold or perform certain jobs (e.g., airline pilot) is altered. He or she may also become eligible to participate in a variety of clinical experiments aimed at improving either the diagnosis or the treatment of patients with myocardial infarction. Unfortunately, clinicians and clinical investigators often define the same disease differently. Furthermore, different clinicians may use different definitions of myocardial infarction. For example, characteristics used to define myocardial infarction in one city or country may be interpreted differently by physicians in another city or country, thereby rendering comparisons between cities or countries difficult if not impossible. In a similar fashion, the definition of myocardial infarction in one international study may differ from that used in another clinical trial. This makes it very difficult to compare the results of different pharmacologic, interventional, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				N. I. Parikh, P. Gona, M. G. Larson, C. S. Fox, E. J. Benjamin, J. M. Murabito, C. J. O'Donnell, R. S. Vasan, and D. Levy Long-Term Trends in Myocardial Infarction Incidence and Case Fatality in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study Circulation, March 10, 2009; 119(9): 1203 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. B. Rosen, D. M. Cutler, D. M. Norton, H. M. Hu, and S. Vijan The Value Of Coronary Heart Disease Care For The Elderly: 1987-2002 Health Aff., January 1, 2007; 26(1): 111 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]