Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 54: 238-239, 2008; 10.1373/clinchem.2007.098228
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boyd, J. C.
(Clinical Chemistry. 2008;54:238-239.)
© 2008 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Editorials

Cautions in the Adoption of Common Reference Intervals

James C. Boyd

Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine/Clinical Laboratories, P.O. Box 800214, Charlottesville, VA 22908-0214

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Transferability of test results for a given analyte has long been a goal of the laboratory community. Achievement of transferability will require development of standardized methods that have the least possible measurement uncertainty and are traceable to reference standards. Once accomplished, transferability will allow comparison of laboratory results regardless of the individual performing laboratory and will provide long-term stability of results, enabling longitudinal results to be followed for individual patients. Transferability remains an elusive goal, however. Analytical hindrances include the lack of established reference measurement systems for many quantities, lack of traceability of field methods to the reference system, and lot-to-lot variability in reagents and calibrators.

When no population-specific differences exist, the use of common reference intervals for transferable tests can be envisioned. Enthusiasm for the use of common reference intervals has grown . . . [Full Text of this Article]




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
F. Ceriotti, R. Hinzmann, and M. Panteghini
Reference intervals: the way forward
Ann Clin Biochem, January 1, 2009; 46(1): 8 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.