Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 55: 18-20, 2009. First published November 21, 2008; 10.1373/clinchem.2008.117291
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2008.117291v1
clinchem.2008.117291v2
55/1/18    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sacks, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Sacks, D. B.
(Clinical Chemistry. 2009;55:18-20.)
© 2009 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Perspectives

Tight Glucose Control in the Intensive Care Unit: Are Glucose Meters up to the Task?

Mitchell G. Scott1,a, David E. Bruns2, James C. Boyd2 and David B. Sacks3

1 Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO; 2 University of Virginia Health System, Department of Pathology, Charlottesville, VA; 3 Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110. Fax 314-362-1461; e-mail mscott@labmed.wustl.edu.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Many institutions use tight glycemic control (TGC)1 protocols in their intensive care units (ICUs). TGC protocols became standard of care after the initial, very promising, studies demonstrating that it improved patient outcomes (1). For instance, Van den Berghe et al. (1) demonstrated that TGC reduced mortality by one-third in surgical intensive care patients. Other early studies of TGC also demonstrated marked and significant benefits in infection rates and mortality. Typical TGC protocols consist of placing postoperative and critically ill patients on a continuous intravenous insulin infusion, checking their blood glucose concentrations on an hourly basis (or other schedule), and giving a bolus of insulin and/or changing the infusion rate of insulin based on the glucose concentration, with a goal of maintaining glucose between 4.4 and 6.7 mmol/L (80 and 120 mg/dL). Of the numerous variations in protocols regarding timing and frequency of glucose measurements, insulin infusion rates, and target glucose values, all have a goal of maintaining tight glycemic control in critically ill patients.

A new metaanalysis has suggested that TGC protocols offer limited if any benefits in critically ill adults and revealed that these protocols resulted in a 3- to 5-fold increased risk of hypoglycemia (2). The metaanalysis examined 29 randomized controlled trials that met predefined inclusion criteria. Of the 27 trials that examined mortality as an endpoint, 16 favored TGC and 11 favored usual care, but the reductions in relative risk were statistically significant (95% confidence) in only 2 of the 16 favoring TGC and in none of the 11 favoring usual care. The only outcome for which TGC demonstrated a significantly reduced risk was the development of septicemia; this was seen in surgical intensive care patients but not in medical ICU . . . [Full Text of this Article]




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Van den Berghe, M. Schetz, D. Vlasselaers, G. Hermans, A. Wilmer, R. Bouillon, and D. Mesotten
Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: NICE-SUGAR or Leuven Blood Glucose Target?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2009; 94(9): 3163 - 3170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. Van den Berghe, R. Bouillon, D. Mesotten, S. S. Braithwaite, J. Pei, D. Yi, T. K. Khoo, K. A. Olsen, K. Mohammedi, R. Roussel, et al.
Glucose control in critically ill patients.
N. Engl. J. Med., July 2, 2009; 361(1): 89 - 90.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
E. S. Moghissi, M. T. Korytkowski, M. DiNardo, D. Einhorn, R. Hellman, I. B. Hirsch, S. E. Inzucchi, F. Ismail-Beigi, M. S. Kirkman, and G. E. Umpierrez
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Diabetes Association Consensus Statement on Inpatient Glycemic Control
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2009; 32(6): 1119 - 1131.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. E.G. Griesdale, R. J. de Souza, R. M. van Dam, D. K. Heyland, D. J. Cook, A. Malhotra, R. Dhaliwal, W. R. Henderson, D. R. Chittock, S. Finfer, et al.
Intensive insulin therapy and mortality among critically ill patients: a meta-analysis including NICE-SUGAR study data
Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 14, 2009; 180(8): 821 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
G. Van den Berghe, D. Mesotten, and I. Vanhorebeek
Intensive insulin therapy in the intensive care unit
Can. Med. Assoc. J., April 14, 2009; 180(8): 799 - 800.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.