Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 55: 850-852, 2009. First published March 12, 2009; 10.1373/clinchem.2009.126037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2009.126037v1
55/5/850    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bruns, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Knowler, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bruns, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Knowler, W. C.
(Clinical Chemistry. 2009;55:850-852.)
© 2009 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Editorials

Stabilization of Glucose in Blood Samples: Why It Matters

David E. Bruns1,a and William C. Knowler2

1 Department of Pathology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA; 2 Diabetes Epidemiology and Clinical Research Section, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Phoenix, AZ.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Pathology, P.O. Box 800168, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA 22908. Fax 1-434-924-2574; e-mail dbruns@virginia.edu.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

In this issue of Clinical Chemistry, Gambino et al. (1) describe careful studies of a blood-collection container that stabilizes the concentration of glucose in blood samples. At a time of an increasing disease burden attributable to diabetes and the use of lower glucose concentrations than in the past for the diagnosis of diabetes, this study and its findings are especially important.

Measurements of glucose are used worldwide to diagnose diabetes and to identify patients at risk of developing diabetes [e.g., (2)(3)]. For both diagnosis and risk assessment, fixed cutpoints of plasma glucose concentrations are used to classify patients and to make decisions regarding management. For this reason, all steps in the analytical process require careful attention.


Sources of Error in Measurements of Plasma Glucose

Clinical chemists in hospital laboratories and diagnostic companies have made great strides in improving the measurement of glucose. With the use of enzymatic methods and sophisticated analyzers with stable optics, electronics, fluid handling, and other components, central clinical laboratories routinely achieve an astoundingly low within-laboratory imprecision (CV) of 1%–2%. [Glucose meters do not fare so well and are not recommended for diagnosis of diabetes (4).] By contrast, the preanalytical issues surrounding glucose measurements have not been solved.

The loss of glucose in blood samples has been studied for many years (5). Glucose is lost through glycolysis at a rate of 5%–7%/h at concentrations near the reference interval. In absolute terms, a loss in glucose of about 0.67 mmol/L (12 mg/dL) occurs at a concentration of 5.55 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) after 2 h at room temperature (6). Higher rates of loss occur commonly, such as with increased ambient temperature and in samples with high white blood cell counts. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Diagnosis of Diabetes


Further Implications of a Truly Stabilized Glucose Sample




The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
The International Expert Committee
International Expert Committee Report on the Role of the A1C Assay in the Diagnosis of Diabetes
Diabetes Care, July 1, 2009; 32(7): 1327 - 1334.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.