Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 55: 1268-1270, 2009. First published May 14, 2009; 10.1373/clinchem.2009.127308
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2009.127308v1
55/7/1268    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kågedal, B.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kågedal, B.
(Clinical Chemistry. 2009;55:1268-1270.)
© 2009 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Editorials

Detecting Minimal Residual Disease in Neuroblastoma: Still a Ways to Go

Bertil Kågedal1,a

1 Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.

aAddress correspondence to the author at: Department of Clinical Chemistry, University Hospital, S-581 85 Linköping, Sweden. Fax +46-13-223240; e-mail bertil.kagedal@lio.se.

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood and accounts for 10% of all cancers in children. The development of neuroblastoma involves both embryonic and tumorigenic factors, making the tumor very heterogeneous both biologically and clinically. Neuroblastoma tumors originate from embryonic neural crest cells committed to the development of the sympathetic nervous system, and their malignancy varies from totally benign with spontaneous regression to highly malignant (1). Prognostic factors include age of the patient at diagnosis, INSS (International Neuroblastoma Staging System) stage, tumor histopathology, and ploidy status of DNA content (2). Despite the availability of many clinical and biologic markers proposed as predictive of disease outcome and the use of advanced multimodal therapy, treatment results are still suboptimal for patients with these tumors. Thus, how to best estimate patient prognosis and choose optimal individual therapy remain fundamental challenges.

Since the discovery by Moss et al. (3) 20 years ago of neuroblastoma cells in the blood of a majority of patients with known disseminated disease, much work has been devoted to the development and improvement of methods for detection of minimal residual disease (MRD).1

In this issue of Clinical Chemistry Stutterheim et al. (4) address the question of how to best identify the presence of neuroblastoma cells in blood and bone marrow by use of reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RQ-PCR). The authors recently investigated the use of paired-like homeobox 2b (PHOX2B)2 as a marker for MRD in neuroblastoma and claimed reported that this transcript was the most specific single marker for this purpose (5). In the current study they selected 28 genes from SAGE libraries that showed high expression in neuroblastoma tumors and little or no expression in normal tissues. Preliminary studies of these 28 genes and . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Association for Clinical Chemistry.